Are Physicians and Patients in Agreement? Exploring Dyadic Concordance

Abstract

Dyadic concordance in physician-patient interactions can be defined as the extent of agreement between physicians and patients in their perceptions of the clinical encounter. The current research specifically examined two types of concordance: informational concordance-the extent of agreement in physician and patient responses regarding patient information (education, self-rated health, pain); and interactional concordance-the extent of physician-patient agreement regarding the patient's level of confidence and trust in the physician and the perceived quality of explanations concerning diagnosis and treatment. Using a convenience sample of physicians and patients (N = 50 dyads), a paired survey method was tested, which measured and compared physician and patient reports to identify informational and interactional concordances. Factors potentially related to dyadic concordance were also measured, including demographic characteristics (patient race, gender, age, and education) and clinical factors (whether this was a first visit and physician specialty in family medicine or oncology). The paired survey showed informational discordances, as physicians tended to underestimate patients' pain and overestimate patient education. Interactional discordances included overestimating patients' understanding of diagnosis and treatment explanations and patients' level of confidence and trust. Discordances were linked to patient dissatisfaction with physician listening, having unanswered questions, and feeling the physician had not spent enough time. The paired survey method effectively identified physician-patient discordances that may interfere with effective medical practice; this method may be used in various settings to identify potential areas of improvement in health communication and education.

Improving health literacy in a Japanese community population—A pilot study to develop an educational programme

“…Individuals with lower health literacy or education level are more likely to have unrealistic expectations regarding health care, often exacerbated by difficulties in obtaining and understanding health information . This can often lead to dissatisfaction with the health‐care system and in some cases growing distrust of health‐care professionals . Effective patient education and improved health literacy could lead to the modification of such unrealistic expectations and may also help foster improved trust in health‐care professionals …”

Satisfaction with current psoriasis treatment: Misalignment between physician and patient perceptions

“…Patients should therefore be encouraged to disclose this information either formally via the use of standardized tools such as the DLQI or informally via a discussion. With regards to communication on treatment options, physicians may overestimate their patients' disease education [13,14,21]. Particularly, psoriasis patients have previously expressed a desire for more information from their dermatologists [16].…”

Probleme in der integrativmedizinischen Weiterbildung von Ärzten an anthroposophischen Kliniken Deutschlands und der Schweiz

“…1; Kasten 2). Tatsächlich resultiert Zeitmangel in ungenügender Konkordanz zwischen Arzt und Patient [23], mit Folgen für die diagnostische und therapeutische Qualität. Es wundert also nicht, dass bei den genannten Problemen der Arbeitsbelastung sowie den Personal- und Organisationsdefiziten auch die Zeit fehlt, sich mit den AM-Heilmitteln intensiv auseinanderzusetzen oder die Patienten zu meditieren, denn AM erfordert als differenziertes Ganzheitssystem ein gründliches Studium [7,24] und die rationale oder meditative Heilmittelfindung sorgfältige innere Auseinandersetzung [8].…”