2016
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.16.16603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Physicians Influenced by Their Own Specialty Society's Guidelines Regarding Mammography Screening? An Analysis of Nationally Representative Data

Abstract: Family and internal medicine physicians, whose societies adhered to 2009 USPSTF recommendations for biennial screening starting at age 50 years, showed statistically significant decreases in mammography referral rates over time. Obstetricians and gynecologists, whose society continued to recommend annual screening starting at age 40 years, showed no statistically significant change in mammography referral rates over time. Physicians may be influenced by their own society's recommendations, which may influence … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Characteristics of included studies Among the included studies were three cohort studies, 17,27,28 five cross-sectional studies, 15,16,23,25,26 four surveys that measured physician's perceptions of the influence of guidelines on their practice or screening recommendations, [18][19][20]22 two surveys that measured patients' knowledge Table 1. Definitions of Overuse in Included Studies Any self-breast exam 24 Screening in patients with limited life expectancy 16,18,22,[24][25][26][27] Guideline discordant screening Offering nonrecommended MRI testing for screening 17,19,20 Utilizing multiple conflicting guidelines from USPSTF/ ACS/ACOG 22,25 Screening more frequently than recommended 16 Patient's lack of awareness and knowledge, or negative attitude toward, or resistance to implement the revised USPSTF guidelines 14,21,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Characteristics of included studies Among the included studies were three cohort studies, 17,27,28 five cross-sectional studies, 15,16,23,25,26 four surveys that measured physician's perceptions of the influence of guidelines on their practice or screening recommendations, [18][19][20]22 two surveys that measured patients' knowledge Table 1. Definitions of Overuse in Included Studies Any self-breast exam 24 Screening in patients with limited life expectancy 16,18,22,[24][25][26][27] Guideline discordant screening Offering nonrecommended MRI testing for screening 17,19,20 Utilizing multiple conflicting guidelines from USPSTF/ ACS/ACOG 22,25 Screening more frequently than recommended 16 Patient's lack of awareness and knowledge, or negative attitude toward, or resistance to implement the revised USPSTF guidelines 14,21,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prominent flaws included the lack of reporting of response rates (in survey) 18 and the lack of use of validated tools for data collection. 19,21 One cross-sectional study 25 used office-based preventive service visits from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) data, in which it was not possible to examine the frequency of screening by individual as some women patients could contribute multiple visits.…”
Section: Risk Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations