2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.07.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are preoperative sestamibi scans useful for identifying ectopic parathyroid glands in patients with expected multigland parathyroid disease?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different techniques have been proposed to aid in parathyroid gland identification. [9][10][11] Paras and colleagues 12 examined the use of autofluorescence with the Raman technique to differentiate parathyroid glands from other tissues and identified a statistically higher number of parathyroid glands when nearinfrared light (NIRL) was used relative to standard white light (WL). [13][14][15] Variables like patient sex, age, and primary diagnosis exerted no influence on the fluorescent intensity of surrounding tissues, including thyroid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different techniques have been proposed to aid in parathyroid gland identification. [9][10][11] Paras and colleagues 12 examined the use of autofluorescence with the Raman technique to differentiate parathyroid glands from other tissues and identified a statistically higher number of parathyroid glands when nearinfrared light (NIRL) was used relative to standard white light (WL). [13][14][15] Variables like patient sex, age, and primary diagnosis exerted no influence on the fluorescent intensity of surrounding tissues, including thyroid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karipineni failed to provide THPT specific data, as their population also included SHPT, iodine induced HPT, and MEN syndrome induced HPT patients. 16 Overall, they demonstrated sensitivity, for ectopic glands only, of 36% for MIBI and 7% for US.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The authors of these studies defined false positives as an area of distinct MIBI accumulation in an area which did not coincide with an abnormal gland at time of surgery; false negatives were defined as a lack of MIBI accumulation in an area where an abnormal gland was found at time of surgery. 3,16 The authors of this paper decided not to summarise results of this study as sensitivity or specificity as it produced ordinal, not dichotomous, outcomes (fully successful, partially successful and unsuccessful). Therefore, to calculate sensitivity and specificity, it would mean moving the 'partial success' into one of the other groups, creating dichotomous variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of US with 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT had a higher sensitivity than US or 99mTcsestamibi SPECT/CT alone (Yuan et al 2016). Most authors thus conclude that ultrasound and sestamibi scintigraphy offer little benefit in localizing ectopic glands and rarely change the conduct of a standard four-gland exploration (Alkhalili et al 2015, Karipineni et al 2018, van der Plas et al 2019. However, some authors have found that SPECT-CT offered useful information (Taieb et al 2013).…”
Section: Preoperative Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%