2017
DOI: 10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p88
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Prospective English Teachers Linguistically Intelligent?

Abstract: Language is normally associated with linguistic capabilities of individuals. In the theory of multiple intelligences, language is considered to be related primarily to linguistic intelligence. Using the theory of Multiple Intelligences as its starting point, this descriptive survey study investigated to what extent prospective English teachers' high school education contributed to the development of linguistic intelligence which is essential for language teachers. The data were collected, using the Teele Inven… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gardner"s theory of MI has received remarkable attention by persons in the fields of education in Turkey. Studies with Turkish samples involved exploring MI applications and academic achievement (Yurt & Polat, 2015); use of MI in teaching visual arts class (Eraslan Taspinar, & Kaya, 2016); comparison of athletes and non-athletes adolescents MI profiles (Bozkus, Erol, Elci, & Bozkus, 2014); MI profiles and learning foreign languages (Tezel, 2017;Iyitoglu & Aydin, 2015;Senbaz Filiz, 2010); teaching math (Yilmaz, 2012) to name but a few. Likewise, there have been a considerable number of studies working with samples of pre-service teachers (i.e., Gurbuzoglu-Yalmanci, & Gozum, 2013;Ozgen, Tataroglu, & Alkan, 2011;Yenice & Aktamis, 2010;Durmaz, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gardner"s theory of MI has received remarkable attention by persons in the fields of education in Turkey. Studies with Turkish samples involved exploring MI applications and academic achievement (Yurt & Polat, 2015); use of MI in teaching visual arts class (Eraslan Taspinar, & Kaya, 2016); comparison of athletes and non-athletes adolescents MI profiles (Bozkus, Erol, Elci, & Bozkus, 2014); MI profiles and learning foreign languages (Tezel, 2017;Iyitoglu & Aydin, 2015;Senbaz Filiz, 2010); teaching math (Yilmaz, 2012) to name but a few. Likewise, there have been a considerable number of studies working with samples of pre-service teachers (i.e., Gurbuzoglu-Yalmanci, & Gozum, 2013;Ozgen, Tataroglu, & Alkan, 2011;Yenice & Aktamis, 2010;Durmaz, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%