2007
DOI: 10.16993/ibero.198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Regional Blocs Leading from Nation States to Global Governance?: A Skeptical View from Latin America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
11

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…In sum, neither Mercosur because of its UNASUR because of and rivalry -have turned out to be solid boards for Brazilian Mercosur became stagnated and UNASUR has yet to become more than a photo-op forum in which the Bolivarian impetlL~ is at least as as Brazil '8 more influence. The conditions that may foster or limit regional integratIOn processes depend on demand (derivcd from common gains), supply (i.e., leadership), and iner tial (i.e., institutional) conditions (Mattli 1999;Malamud and Castro 2007). In South America, a low level of all these explains not only regional underperformance but also the free-riding behavior of prospective leaders and followers alike (Burges 2005(Burges , 2006.…”
Section: Collective Leadership: Erratic Attempts At Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sum, neither Mercosur because of its UNASUR because of and rivalry -have turned out to be solid boards for Brazilian Mercosur became stagnated and UNASUR has yet to become more than a photo-op forum in which the Bolivarian impetlL~ is at least as as Brazil '8 more influence. The conditions that may foster or limit regional integratIOn processes depend on demand (derivcd from common gains), supply (i.e., leadership), and iner tial (i.e., institutional) conditions (Mattli 1999;Malamud and Castro 2007). In South America, a low level of all these explains not only regional underperformance but also the free-riding behavior of prospective leaders and followers alike (Burges 2005(Burges , 2006.…”
Section: Collective Leadership: Erratic Attempts At Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dentre os heterodoxos, encontram-se duas posições diferentes: pragmáticos e progressistas (MALAMUD e CASTRO, 2007). Os pragmáticos defendem um enfoque prioritariamente econômico de um Mercosul que produza benefícios econômicos para o país e onde a institucionalização será bem vinda somente na medida em que aumente sua eficácia neste campo.…”
Section: O Papel Das Idéias Nos Processos De Integração Regionalunclassified
“…Em termos estritamente econômicos, a principal divergência está situada entre os chamados ortodoxos (de corte mais liberal) e os heterodoxos. 3 Esta coexistência de diferentes visões sobre o bloco contribuiu para a falta de precisão de seus objetivos, assim como para o que Malamud (2005) chama de uma diferença entre o Mercosul existente e o Mercosul que se deseja.…”
Section: Diferentes Pontos De Vista E Percepções Sobre O Mercosulunclassified
“…Entre os heterodoxos, encontram-se duas posições diferentes: pragmáticos e progressistas (MALAMUD; CASTRO, 2007). 4 Dentro da percepção da importância da atuação do Estado e do bloco na promoção do desenvolvimento industrial de seus países-membros, os pragmáticos defendem um enfoque prioritariamente econômico de um Mercosul que produza benefícios econômicos para o país e no qual a institucionalização será bem-vinda somente se aumentar sua eficácia neste campo.…”
Section: Miriam Gomes Saraivaunclassified