2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-12871-9_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Small Firms More Dependent on the Local Environment than Larger Firms? Evidence from Portuguese Manufacturing Firms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, localization economies will be measured by a location quotient, which retains the relative importance of the share of employment in the industry and in the region relative to the national levels (used, namely by Hervas‐Oliver et al, ; Liang & Goetz, ; and Mukkala, ). In our study we use localization economies (SPE), based on employment, for the industry i in region r , for each period t , that is defined as: SPEirt=LirtrLitalicirtiLitalicirtirLitalicirt, A second source of externalities are the diversity economies, commonly proxied by the inverse of the Herfindahl–Hirschman index of industry concentration based on the employment share of the different industries, excluding the respective industry (used by Fafchamps & Hamine, ; Carreira & Lopes, ; and Martin, Mayer, & Mayneris, ). The diversity economies (DIV), based on employment, for the industry i in region r with respect to the rest of the economy ( i' ≠ i ), are thus calculated as: DIVirt=1i=1iiLirtLrtLirt2 Finally, to capture the regional knowledge base of a region, we consider regional R&D employment ( RD ), calculated as the number of employees that have, in each region, an occupation related to R&D (see Table for the details of the occupations that we have considered).…”
Section: Empirical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, localization economies will be measured by a location quotient, which retains the relative importance of the share of employment in the industry and in the region relative to the national levels (used, namely by Hervas‐Oliver et al, ; Liang & Goetz, ; and Mukkala, ). In our study we use localization economies (SPE), based on employment, for the industry i in region r , for each period t , that is defined as: SPEirt=LirtrLitalicirtiLitalicirtirLitalicirt, A second source of externalities are the diversity economies, commonly proxied by the inverse of the Herfindahl–Hirschman index of industry concentration based on the employment share of the different industries, excluding the respective industry (used by Fafchamps & Hamine, ; Carreira & Lopes, ; and Martin, Mayer, & Mayneris, ). The diversity economies (DIV), based on employment, for the industry i in region r with respect to the rest of the economy ( i' ≠ i ), are thus calculated as: DIVirt=1i=1iiLirtLrtLirt2 Finally, to capture the regional knowledge base of a region, we consider regional R&D employment ( RD ), calculated as the number of employees that have, in each region, an occupation related to R&D (see Table for the details of the occupations that we have considered).…”
Section: Empirical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to one of the criteria proposed by the European Commission, we define an SME as a firm whose annual turnover is between 10 and 50 million euro. We limit the sample to SMEs because they are more sensitive to the local context than larger enterprises (Carreira & Lopes, 2015).…”
Section: Empirical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%