2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2013.05.282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are structural analogues to bisphenol A a safe alternative?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The US EPA identified 19 substances that could potentially be used in thermal paper as BPA substitutes through stakeholder involvement and based on their physical and chemical properties and commercial use (US EPA, 2014). Another study identified five phenolic alternatives to BPA based on their chemical structure (Rosenmai et al, 2013). Only bisphenol S (BPS; 4,4 0 -sulfonyldiphenol) and bisphenol F (BPF, Bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)methane) were identified as alternatives in both studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The US EPA identified 19 substances that could potentially be used in thermal paper as BPA substitutes through stakeholder involvement and based on their physical and chemical properties and commercial use (US EPA, 2014). Another study identified five phenolic alternatives to BPA based on their chemical structure (Rosenmai et al, 2013). Only bisphenol S (BPS; 4,4 0 -sulfonyldiphenol) and bisphenol F (BPF, Bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)methane) were identified as alternatives in both studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A paper on the safety of five BPA alternatives was recently published 21 during the preparation of this manuscript. For the four out of their five BPA alternatives cited by Rosenmai, we had extracted similar experimental estrogenic activity data from EADB in the course of our work.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the similarity in the structure, these analogues are suspected to have similar toxic effects. , It has been reported that BPB, BPF, BPS, and bisphenol AF (BPAF) exhibit estrogenic or anti-androgenic activities similar to or even greater than those of BPA. Bisphenol FL (BPFL) has been suggested to have anti-estrogenic effects in vitro and cause adverse effects on uterotrophic activity in mice, even at doses lower than the NOAEL (5 mg/kg bw/day) reported for BPA . Moreover, the chlorinated derivatives exhibited a higher estrogenic activity and a greater capability to activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPAR-γ) than BPs. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%