2018
DOI: 10.1080/11038128.2017.1397190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are the school version of the assessment of motor and process skills measures valid for German-speaking children?

Abstract: Because the only identified clinically meaningful difference was associated with likely scoring error of one rater, the international age-normative means of the School AMPS appear to be valid for use with children in GSE.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the evaluation tool occupational therapists used were mostly nonstandardized. This finding is of relevance because it shows that despite existing school-based occupational therapy assessments with evidence for its use in Switzerland [45], occupational therapists tend to use nonstandardized evaluation tools. An explanation for this result could be that occupational therapy services in mainstream schools are considered as an emerging field in Switzerland [46], and, therefore, occupational therapy assessments for use in schools might not be well known yet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the evaluation tool occupational therapists used were mostly nonstandardized. This finding is of relevance because it shows that despite existing school-based occupational therapy assessments with evidence for its use in Switzerland [45], occupational therapists tend to use nonstandardized evaluation tools. An explanation for this result could be that occupational therapy services in mainstream schools are considered as an emerging field in Switzerland [46], and, therefore, occupational therapy assessments for use in schools might not be well known yet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of the education system, movement testing in physical education has also gained extensive attention [ 19 ], and various studies of movement testing in physical education have been conducted in recent years [ 20 26 ]. However, because of the inconsistent general academic terms and different research purposes, the concepts, operations, and measurements in the research of motor skills overlap and are confusing [ 9 , 23 , 27 , 28 ]. The concepts of “motor skill,” “movement skill,” “motor skill competency,” and so on are used interchangeably to express the same meaning, but they form their own systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%