1992
DOI: 10.2307/1163405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Three Heads Better Than One? Reflections on Doing Collaborative Interdisciplinary Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…source of support, type of support, perception of support, etc.). These codes were developed and refined in a team context to ensure that differences in interpretations were openly discussed and negotiated (Crow et al 1992). Thus the analysis of the qualitative data yielded was not purely inductive from the start, but was guided by more or less well‐defined questions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…source of support, type of support, perception of support, etc.). These codes were developed and refined in a team context to ensure that differences in interpretations were openly discussed and negotiated (Crow et al 1992). Thus the analysis of the qualitative data yielded was not purely inductive from the start, but was guided by more or less well‐defined questions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negotiating one's way with colleagues from other disciplines can be challenging because of the "creative tension" that exists when it is believed that a certain perspective(s) takes precedence (Inglis, 2007). The interarticulation of different discourses that is necessary to arrive at a common language is a difficult path (Buller, 2008;Crow, Levine, & Nager, 1992;Choi & Pak, 2006;Oughton & Bracken, 2009;Spence, 2012).…”
Section: Why Not Interdisciplinarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This person must have credibility with all members, and be a skilled moderator and mediator of personalities and disciplinary perspectives (Bruhn, 1995;Maton et al, 2006). There must be parity and reciprocity among members for successful integration (Crow et al, 1992), in the midst of an "acknowledged departure from the robustness of disciplinary-specific epistemologies and an acceptance of the inherent 'messiness' of communication" (Buller, 2008, p. 397). Researchers must be able "to make mistakes gracefully" (Aboelela et al, 2007).…”
Section: A Case For Sport Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some are concerned that collaboration does not always produce a higher quality product than individual research [14]. However, educators view social interaction as a valuable learning strategy, and many institutional researchers collaborate on their own work, yet it is not often employed in graduate capstone projects such as theses in America [15]. This study adds to the limited research in the area of collaborative master's theses.…”
Section: Thesis Collaboration Challengesmentioning
confidence: 93%