2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecns.2021.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Traditional and Simulated Clinical Environments Meeting Nursing Students’ Learning Needs?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As VR technology continues to grow and expand, the costs associated with this technology could become more affordable. 49,50 From the student perspective, potential student fees and added technology costs for overall educational programs should be noted. With a growing trend of online/distance education, which became paramount during the COVID-19 pandemic, development, implementation, and evaluation of simulations of high-quality merit would also be important to consider.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As VR technology continues to grow and expand, the costs associated with this technology could become more affordable. 49,50 From the student perspective, potential student fees and added technology costs for overall educational programs should be noted. With a growing trend of online/distance education, which became paramount during the COVID-19 pandemic, development, implementation, and evaluation of simulations of high-quality merit would also be important to consider.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the evidence generated from research quantitatively investigating measured outcomes of simulation and debriefing has consistently grown, there is a lack of evidence generated from the traditional clinical model. In fact, a systematic review of traditional clinical outcomes in prelicensure nursing education revealed that there is no rigorous testing of measured clinical outcomes ( Leighton, Kardong-Edgren, & Gilbert, 2021 ). It is widely accepted by nursing educators that consistent, standardized clinical experiences cannot be guaranteed for every prelicensure nursing student in clinical settings in the traditional clinical model, despite the overwhelming evidence of published reports of measurable outcomes in simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this disparity in quantitative measurable learning outcomes, traditional clinical learning experiences continue to remain the gold standard in nursing academia ( Sullivan et al., 2019 ), serving as the foundation on which all simulation regulations are based. Yet recent studies reveal grim findings regarding the historical lack of measured learning experiences in clinical sites ( Leighton et al., 2021 ) even as practice partners are reporting that new graduate nurses are poorly prepared for professional practice ( Kavanagh & Szweda, 2017 ). In fact, Kavanagh and Sharpnack (2021) reported a progressive decline since 2015 from 23% preparedness (n = 1225) to a mere 9% (n = 1222).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The implementation of need analysis had the function to support the understanding of students in the learning process because the material is based on students' needs (Leighton et al, 2021;Mâtheiken et al, 2012). One of the materials that can be implemented in this need analysis is English for Specific Purpose (ESP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%