2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2015.11.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are vegetation indices derived from consumer-grade cameras mounted on UAVs sufficiently reliable for assessing experimental plots?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
146
0
10

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
146
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to their low costs and low weight, consumer-grade true colour (RGB) digital cameras are particularly suitable for assessing green vegetation using UAS-based imaging systems (Torres-Sánchez et al 2014; Saberioon et al 2014; Hoffmann et al 2016a; Goodbody et al 2017; Jannoura et al 2015). Rasmussen et al (2016) evaluated the reliability of four VIs (ExG, NGRDI, NDVI, ENDVI) derived from consumer-grade RGB as well as CIR (colour-infrared) cameras mounted on UAS. Even though CIR cameras are sometimes recommended rather than RGB cameras, they found no clear advantage of CIR images and concluded that RGB cameras are powerful tools for assessing green vegetation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to their low costs and low weight, consumer-grade true colour (RGB) digital cameras are particularly suitable for assessing green vegetation using UAS-based imaging systems (Torres-Sánchez et al 2014; Saberioon et al 2014; Hoffmann et al 2016a; Goodbody et al 2017; Jannoura et al 2015). Rasmussen et al (2016) evaluated the reliability of four VIs (ExG, NGRDI, NDVI, ENDVI) derived from consumer-grade RGB as well as CIR (colour-infrared) cameras mounted on UAS. Even though CIR cameras are sometimes recommended rather than RGB cameras, they found no clear advantage of CIR images and concluded that RGB cameras are powerful tools for assessing green vegetation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang [11] et al successfully differentiated vegetation areas from non-vegetation areas by analyzing color images acquired from a UAV. Rasmussen [14] et al investigated four different vegetation indices acquired from a color camera and a color-infrared camera by using both a fixed-wing UAV and a rotary-wing UAV, and concluded that vegetation indices based on UAV imagery have the same ability to quantify crop responses with ground-based recordings. However, when UAV imagery was applied into quantitative remote sensing, special attention should be paid to the process of ground truth samplings.…”
Section: Uncertainties Errors and Accuraciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the application of color cameras also sharply decreases the high cost of remote sensing [12], since most digital cameras use a Bayer-pattern array of filters to obtain an RGB digital image, and the acquisition of near-infrared (NIR) band images usually requires an extra filter that converts digital numbers of either blue or red light in Bayer array into NIR readings through massive post-processing and calibration work [13]. Rasmussen et al investigated the reliability of four different vegetation indices derived from consumer-grade true color camera as well as a color-infrared camera that are mounted on UAVs for assessing experimental plots, and concluded that vegetation indices of UAV imagery have the same ability as ground-based recordings to quantify crop responses to experimental treatments, although such shortcomings like angular variations in reflectance, stitching, and ambient light fluctuation should be taken into consideration [14]. Torres-Sánchez et al mapped multi-temporal vegetation fraction in early-season wheat fields by using a UAV equipped with commercial color camera and studied the influence of flight altitude and days after sowing on the classification accuracy, which showed that visible spectral vegetation indices derived from low-altitude UAV-camera system could be used as a suitable tool to discriminate vegetation in wheat fields in the early season [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this dual angle dataset Duan et al showed an improvement in the estimation of the leaf area index (LAI). Reflectance anisotropy is also reported as an unwanted effect: Rasmussen et al [36] investigated the performance of different vegetation indices using a consumer-grade camera mounted on a UAV and observed strong angular variation in reflectance images acquired in sunny conditions. To avoid these anisotropic effects, they advised to acquire data during clouded days.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%