2010
DOI: 10.1159/000315889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are We Making a Real Difference? Update on ‘Hidden Mortality’ in the Management of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

Abstract: Reports of improved survival rates for cases of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) patients have prevailed in the literature over the past 10 years. These improvements have been attributed to advances in medical management in the postnatal period. However, further inquiries into the true survival of CDH patients through population-based studies have revealed that the reported increase in survival outcomes, which are often single institution-based reports, are confounded by case selection bias which fails to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, survival estimates derived from institutional or unit-based data lend themselves to multiple biases. A recent careful evaluation of survival variables comparing all institution and population data from the province of Ontario, Canada, demonstrated a clear discrepancy in institution-based reporting [86,87]. The number of deaths reported by the institutions was found to be 32% less than that of the population data.…”
Section: Long-term Prognosis Of Cdh Infancymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, survival estimates derived from institutional or unit-based data lend themselves to multiple biases. A recent careful evaluation of survival variables comparing all institution and population data from the province of Ontario, Canada, demonstrated a clear discrepancy in institution-based reporting [86,87]. The number of deaths reported by the institutions was found to be 32% less than that of the population data.…”
Section: Long-term Prognosis Of Cdh Infancymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the majority of studies are derived from the experience of tertiary referral institutions, which invariably results in case selection bias and the impact of pregnancy termination, which is difficult to quantify. 15,16 The aim of this study is to review the temporal changes in the perinatal management of CDH and the 1-year survival rates from 1996 to 2015 in the state of Western Australia. We hypothesized that with advancements in the postnatal management of infants with CDH, there have been improved survival outcomes.…”
Section: Most Of These Studies Examined the Various Clinical And Etiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors include the presence of other major anomalies, chromosomal aberrations, preterm birth, and low birth weight. However, the majority of studies are derived from the experience of tertiary referral institutions, which invariably results in case selection bias and the impact of pregnancy termination, which is difficult to quantify …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a life‐threatening developmental anomaly, which arises early during human development. Its birth incidence fluctuates worldwide around 1 in 2,000–3,000 new‐borns and it is an important cause of stillbirths and abortions 1–3. CDH patients suffer from severe respiratory distress caused by a classical “trio” of features: a defect in the muscular or tendinous portion of the diaphragm, pulmonary hypoplasia, and pulmonary hypertension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%