2022
DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are We Undertreating Black Patients with Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors? Critical Analysis of Current Surveillance Guidelines by Race

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) survival outcomes differ by race. Current recommendations for surveillance of PNETs less than 2 cm in size are based on low malignant potential and low rates of lymph node metastases (LNM). We investigated whether these guidelines are universally applicable regardless of race. STUDY DESIGN: A multi-institutional analysis of patients with resected, nonfunctional, sporadic PNETs was performed initially us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21 Pancreatic NETs of Black patients had a higher incidence of lymph node metastases in small primary tumors <2 cm in size, suggesting that a specific strategy might be needed for non-White patients. 22 However, a post hoc Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed no clear mortality risk for Black patients (HR 0.36 [0.085-1.5], p = 0.16), thus denying race as a clear effect modifier in our cohort. Since our multivariable analysis did not assume interactions in the model, other unknown different treatment effects could bias the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…21 Pancreatic NETs of Black patients had a higher incidence of lymph node metastases in small primary tumors <2 cm in size, suggesting that a specific strategy might be needed for non-White patients. 22 However, a post hoc Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed no clear mortality risk for Black patients (HR 0.36 [0.085-1.5], p = 0.16), thus denying race as a clear effect modifier in our cohort. Since our multivariable analysis did not assume interactions in the model, other unknown different treatment effects could bias the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The current lack of diversity identified in BRCA research is of concern as it does not assess human variability, 31 , 32 thus limiting the generalizability of research findings that may not account for differences in biological and sociocultural factors across populations impacting PC susceptibility and treatment outcomes. 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 For BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, founder mutations have been identified across multiple ethnicities, 67 , 68 including African Americans and Hispanics, only seldom profiled in PC due to global and racial disparities in BRCA testing uptake. 26 , 27 This will likely compound the already existing inequities in cancer care described for patients with PC, 23 , 24 , 25 which translates to poorer survival amongst non-white populations, especially African Americans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies demonstrated that race was related to lymph node metastasis and prognosis (Oweira et al 2017 ; Zheng-Pywell et al 2022 ). Rui Zheng-Pywell et al reveals that black patients had a higher risk of LNM in tumors less than 2 cm in size compared with white patients (Zheng-Pywell et al 2022 ). In our study, Asian PC patients such as Chinese, Japanese, and Korean were less likely to undergo LNM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%