2015
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/27/29/293203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ARPES measurements of the superconducting gap of Fe-based superconductors and their implications to the pairing mechanism

Abstract: Its direct momentum sensitivity confers to angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) a unique perspective in investigating the superconducting gap of multi-band systems. In this review we discuss ARPES studies on the superconducting gap of high-temperature Fe-based superconductors. We show that while Fermi-surface-driven pairing mechanisms fail to provide a universal scheme for the Fe-based superconductors, theoretical approaches based on short-range interactions lead to a more robust and universal des… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
47
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 211 publications
5
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The antiferromagnetic wave vector in the Fe-based superconductors connects hole and electron pockets FS pockets, giving rise to the quasi-nesting scenario suggesting that low-energy spin fluctuations may contribute to the superconducting pairing [28][29][30]. Although the quasi-nesting scenario is now seriously challenged [19], in particular due to the existence of high-T c superconductivity without hole FS pocket in A x Fe 2−x Se 2 [31][32][33][34] and FeSe monolayers [35][36][37][38][39], the Γ-M wave vectors connects the top of the holelike bands and the bottom of the electron bands within an energy range smaller than a few hundreds of meV in all Febased superconductors, suggesting that high-energy spin fluctuations (local moments) may play a role. There is no such electron-hole connection with the antiferromagnetic wave vector in BaCr 2 As 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antiferromagnetic wave vector in the Fe-based superconductors connects hole and electron pockets FS pockets, giving rise to the quasi-nesting scenario suggesting that low-energy spin fluctuations may contribute to the superconducting pairing [28][29][30]. Although the quasi-nesting scenario is now seriously challenged [19], in particular due to the existence of high-T c superconductivity without hole FS pocket in A x Fe 2−x Se 2 [31][32][33][34] and FeSe monolayers [35][36][37][38][39], the Γ-M wave vectors connects the top of the holelike bands and the bottom of the electron bands within an energy range smaller than a few hundreds of meV in all Febased superconductors, suggesting that high-energy spin fluctuations (local moments) may play a role. There is no such electron-hole connection with the antiferromagnetic wave vector in BaCr 2 As 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…72,73 ARPES studies on Ba 1−x K x Fe 2 As 2 and LiFeAs show that the superconducting gap on the d xz /d yz hole pockets is much larger than that on the d xy hole pocket. 62 All these results seem to suggest the dominating role of intra-orbital pairing in FeSCs.…”
Section: The Spin-density Wave Ordermentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This, too, seems to vary between different compounds. For most iron-pnictide compounds studied with comparable hole and electron pockets, the d xz /d yz hole pockets show larger superconducting gap than the d xy hole pocket, 62,74 suggesting the importance of d xz /d yz orbitals to superconductivity. Consistently, in LiFe 1−x Co x As and Ba(Fe 1 −x Co x ) 2 As 2 , when the d xz /d yz hole pockets vanish with electron doping, superconductivity is strongly suppressed.…”
Section: The Spin-density Wave Ordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The superconducting mechanism in iron-based, high temperature superconductors is an important topic in condensed matter physics. One key question is whether the system should be described within a weak coupling BCS-type approach with a key role played by the interband repulsion between electron and hole bands, separated by the large momentum transfer or by a strong coupling approach with dominant short-range antiferromagetic (AF) fluctuations, described by the local exchange interaction [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. The former scenario seemed consistent with experimental results from a number of iron pnictide superconductors [8], but was later challenged by the discovery of iron chalcogenide-based superconductors [9,10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%