2006 American Control Conference 2006
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2006.1655486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Array algorithm for filtering of discrete-time Markovian jump linear systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Derivation of equation (11) Noticing that w k is independent of x k−1 , θ k and v k , and noticing that v k is independent of x k−1 and θ k , we obtain from (1) and (2) that…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Derivation of equation (11) Noticing that w k is independent of x k−1 , θ k and v k , and noticing that v k is independent of x k−1 and θ k , we obtain from (1) and (2) that…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the points j  and the weights j w are obtained from the 3rd-degree cubature rule (14) or the higher 5 th degree cubature rule (15). The corresponding covariance for measurement and cross-covariance are calculated using Eqs.…”
Section: Consensus Based Imm and Cubature Information Filtering Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple model system such as Jump Markov Nonlinear System (JMNLS) has been well-studied [15][16][17] to model the maneuvering target and accordingly, the iterative multiple model (IMM) estimator has been shown to be an effective approach for the single sensor system. In [17], a distributed multiple model UKF was proposed for the estimation of JMNLS and shown to achieve the same performance as the centralized filter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when Kalman filters are computed via Riccati equations, some fundamental properties to guarantee their stability, as for example, Hermitian solutions, are no longer guaranteed (see for instance, [17] for more details). Although the computational and numerical issues have been studied for standard state-space systems for a long time, for MJLSs, only [15,18] have dealt with this kind of problem. These two works proposed array algorithms to compute the linear minimum mean square error estimator (LMMSE) for MJLSs, which provide more accuracy and numerical stability if compared with solutions on the basis of Riccati equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first part solves a Lyapunov equation whose result is used in the second part, which solves a simplified Riccati equation. The better performance of this algorithm, if compared with the array algorithms of [15,18], is because the algorithm exploits the properties that all parameters of the estimator developed in [19] can be frozen. Its solution converges with the assumptions that the system is mean square stable and the Markov chain is ergodic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%