“…Part of the difficulty in evaluating relationships to CVD at low exposure levels has been methodological; for instance, in the United States, the heterogeneity of water sources and limited ranges of exposure make it challenging to derive long-term epidemiological conclusions (Moon et al, 2012;Tsuji et al, 2014a). Nonetheless, while some studies of low to moderate iAs exposure are suggestive of a statistically significant relationship between low arsenic exposure and CVD risk (Gong et al, 2012;Lisabeth et al, 2010;Medrano et al, 2010;Rapant et al, 2009;Meliker et al, 2007), conflicting evidence exists (Lewis et al, 1999;Ruiz-Navarro et al, 1998;Zierold et al, 2004). A recent meta-analysis of 31 studies suggests that the evidence does not support a significant relationship between exposure to 50 mg iAs/L water and CVD outcomes (Moon et al, 2012).…”