1999
DOI: 10.2307/2661201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
7

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 363 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, as I have explored above, we cannot solely interpret Paju —the art object—without simultaneously interpreting SeMA Bunker (the museum), both as the location of Paju and as interweaving with Paju . My anthropological approach to this exhibit and museum not only connects the demilitarization process proffered by Bickford (2013) with Gell's (1998) attention to the agency of art, but also foregrounds Huyssen's (1995:15) invocation of the museum as a place of “possible resurrections.” As a symbol of Korea's anticommunist and militarized past—and, indeed, present—SeMA Bunker resurrects that authoritarian history of intense military buildup and militarization of daily life. Paju as demilitarizing art, as a critique of militarization, thus collides with this resurrection in its placement inside the bunker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, as I have explored above, we cannot solely interpret Paju —the art object—without simultaneously interpreting SeMA Bunker (the museum), both as the location of Paju and as interweaving with Paju . My anthropological approach to this exhibit and museum not only connects the demilitarization process proffered by Bickford (2013) with Gell's (1998) attention to the agency of art, but also foregrounds Huyssen's (1995:15) invocation of the museum as a place of “possible resurrections.” As a symbol of Korea's anticommunist and militarized past—and, indeed, present—SeMA Bunker resurrects that authoritarian history of intense military buildup and militarization of daily life. Paju as demilitarizing art, as a critique of militarization, thus collides with this resurrection in its placement inside the bunker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In short, we cannot consider Paju without also contemplating the exhibition space: the former military bunker turned art space. Recalling Gell's (1998) assertion that art ought to be interpreted through intention, agency, and its transformative potential, I would amend this considering Paju and SeMA Bunker to include the dialogical nature of art and its spatialization, its placement in space. Therefore, as I have explored above, we cannot solely interpret Paju —the art object—without simultaneously interpreting SeMA Bunker (the museum), both as the location of Paju and as interweaving with Paju .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, context and location have been shown to impact how we understand pieces of art (Griswold et al, 2013), and material construction and form additionally mediate how art objects are classified, moved and worked with (Dominguez Rubio, 2014). Negotiating between cultural objects as embodied meaning and as material objects has led some social scientists to attribute a kind of agency to objects (Gell, 1998), often through the idea of affordances (see Gibson, 1986). This idea has been utilised to examine how material objects are open to multiple but not infinite interpretations and how this interpretive capacity is informed by the materiality of the object itself (Acord & DeNora, 2008; Griswold et al, 2013; Zubrzycki, 2013).…”
Section: Theoretical Orientations Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partly this is a thanks‐giving ritual, from within the ethics of care, as the researcher gives thanks to their predecessor who made the work possible; partly it is enchantment ritual, as the presence of the spirit thus summoned can be used to cast a spell on the reader through their magic presence, sometimes spontaneously and dramatically brought out of the abbreviated space of the closed bracket to a full‐blown quotation. They become ‘secondary agents’ (Gell, 1998) to the author's agency. That is, the names of others are used as a reference point for the primary agent (the author of the research) to qualify, hedge, critique or pay homage.…”
Section: Citation As Incantation and Thanksgivingmentioning
confidence: 99%