2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Articulated remains of the extinct shark Ptychodus (Elasmobranchii, Ptychodontidae) from the Upper Cretaceous of Spain provide insights into gigantism, growth rate and life history of ptychodontid sharks

Abstract: Due to their cartilaginous endoskeleton and the continuous tooth replacement, the chondrichthyan fossil record predominantly consists of isolated teeth, which offer diagnostic features for taxonomic identifications, but only provide very limited information of an organism's life history. In contrast, the calcified vertebral centra of elasmobranchs (sharks, skates and rays) yield important information about ecological and biological traits that can be utilized for constructing age-structured population dynamic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(111 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second species, † G. priscus , is based solely upon some isolated scales from the late Eocene (Heckel 1853). Although isolated scales may bear paleoecological signals, they only provide very limited taxonomic information (Ferrón et al 2014), because different morphotypes occur across the body (e.g., Ankhelyi et al 2018; Jambura and Kriwet 2020). Due to a lack of an illustration, it is not possible to unambiguously assign the described scales to a species, hence we consider † G. priscus a nomen dubium .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second species, † G. priscus , is based solely upon some isolated scales from the late Eocene (Heckel 1853). Although isolated scales may bear paleoecological signals, they only provide very limited taxonomic information (Ferrón et al 2014), because different morphotypes occur across the body (e.g., Ankhelyi et al 2018; Jambura and Kriwet 2020). Due to a lack of an illustration, it is not possible to unambiguously assign the described scales to a species, hence we consider † G. priscus a nomen dubium .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…up to 6.4 m TL for the Greenland shark, Somniosus microcephalus; and up to 6.1 m TL for the great hammerhead shark, Sphyrna mokarran (Compagno 1984). It has been suggested that at least some members of the Late Cretaceous durophagous shark genus, Ptychodus, possibly reached at least 10 m TL (Shimada et al 2010;Jambura and Kriwet 2020), and if so, durophagy may be another specialisation pathway that has the potential for elasmobranchs to attain gigantism (Pimiento et al 2019). In addition, some isolated, over-sized lamniform vertebrae are known from Albian (Lower Cretaceous) deposits, and whereas the largest specimen is estimated to have come from an individual that possibly measured 8.3-9.8 m TL, their taxonomic identity remains uncertain (Shimada 1997e;Frederickson et al 2015).…”
Section: Body Size Distribution Of Macrophagous Lamniforms Through Gementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fossa-Mancini (1921) also noted that the ratio between "useful weight" (soft tissues) and "harmful weight" (skeleton) could be greater in ammonites than in other mollusks. This author thus concluded that these shelled cephalopods could ensure sufficient food even for individuals of Ptychodus reaching considerable body sizes (see also Shimada et al, 2010;Jambura & Kriwet, 2020). Like their extinct relatives (e.g., ammonites), living cephalopods have important and diversified roles in marine ecosystems, ranging from occasional scavengers (e.g., nautiloids) at lower trophic levels to carnivorous predators (e.g., squids; Olóriz & Villaseñor, 2010;Lukeneder, 2015).…”
Section: Trophic Specializationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ptychodus Agassiz, 1834 is a genus of Cretaceous elasmobranchs ranging from the Albian to the Campanian with worldwide distribution (Woodward, 1912;Cappetta, 2012). The fossil record of this enigmatic predator mainly includes isolated teeth, very rare associated, but also articulated dentitions and mineralized cartilaginous elements (Nicolis, 1889;Woodward, 1889;Tan, 1949;MacLeod, 1982;Everhart & Caggiano, 2004;Shimada et al, 2010;Cappetta, 2012;Shimada, 2012;Diedrich, 2013;Hamm, 2017;Amadori et al, 2019aAmadori et al, , 2019bAmadori et al, , 2020Jambura & Kriwet, 2020). Ptychodus possessed polygonal, molariform teeth arranged in dental plates suitable for crushing shelled preys (Williston, 1900a(Williston, , 1900bWoodward, 1912;Cappetta, 2012;Shimada, 2012;Diedrich, 2013;Amadori et al, 2019bAmadori et al, , 2020.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%