2018
DOI: 10.1080/17449480.2018.1448936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Articulation, Profit or Loss and OCI in the IASB Conceptual Framework: Different Shades of Clean (or Dirty) Surplus

Abstract: For guidance on citations see FAQs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, our outcomes may be of interest to IFRS developers who may take future actions including the issuing of new standards and/or revisions in existing ones by considering our outcomes to make recycling, as well as net income with recycling, provide higher accounting quality. Moreover, the existing version of recycling is criticized for certain aspects that spring mainly from its complexity as discussed by Tarca et al (2008), Hodgson and Russell (2014) and van Mourik and Asami (2018). Our outcomes may lead to designing future regulations to reduce the complexity of recycling and alleviate other criticisms against recycling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, our outcomes may be of interest to IFRS developers who may take future actions including the issuing of new standards and/or revisions in existing ones by considering our outcomes to make recycling, as well as net income with recycling, provide higher accounting quality. Moreover, the existing version of recycling is criticized for certain aspects that spring mainly from its complexity as discussed by Tarca et al (2008), Hodgson and Russell (2014) and van Mourik and Asami (2018). Our outcomes may lead to designing future regulations to reduce the complexity of recycling and alleviate other criticisms against recycling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the complexity of recycling is still discussed by standard setters and practitioners. For instance, double counting (Hodgson & Russell, 2014;van Mourik & Asami, 2018), reduced ability to extract and process information (Tarca et al, 2008) and evidence for earnings management (Arthur et al, 2017) have raised significant concerns for the complexity of recycling. Independent of such concerns, as underscored by Detzen (2016), the concept of income is very deficient without recycling which aims to maintain being the primary performance indicator role of income.…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%