1976
DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)41894-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial Insemination Using Homologous Semen: A Review of 158 Cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to the epididymal content present in the first fraction. The spermatozoa rich fraction in the first split ejaculate was widely used for artificial insemination [2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 34]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the epididymal content present in the first fraction. The spermatozoa rich fraction in the first split ejaculate was widely used for artificial insemination [2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 34]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely believed that the first portion of a split ejaculate has better fertilizing capacity than either the second portion (Amelar and Hotchkiss -1965) or the whole ejaculate (Amelar and Dubin -1975;Farris and Murphy -1960). Despite this belief, pregnancy rates after artificial insemination with husband semen (AIH) using the first portion of split ejaculates are not consistently better than pregnancy rates after AIH using the whole ejaculate (Amelar and Hotchkiss -1965;Moghissi et al -1977;Dixon et al -1976;Steiman and Taymor -1977;Parez-Pelaez and Cohen -1965;Mastroianni et al -1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Dixon et al [11] find successful homologous inseminations of almost 0-100% in their review of literature, and this percentage is reduced by Moghissi et al [12] to 56%, the extensive literature [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] proves that a comparison of the individual results can hardly stand critical analysis due to fact that the methods used and the patients selected are very different (determination of the time of ovulation, split ejaculate, centrifugal ejaculate, addition of cryosperm, classification of the semen parameters, number of insemination cycles, sterility of the man and/or woman), and the success solely depends on the indication of insemination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The best results with AIH were achieved in cases of impotentia coeundi where the pregnancy rate was 62.5 to 85.7% [18,22,23], followed by a pregnancy rate of 32% [16] in the case of a negative postcoital test with normozoospermia and a rate of 18.75% [11] in the case of unexplained sterility as well as parvisemia with relatively high-quality ejaculate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation