Artificial intelligence and creative activities inside organizational behavior

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate about the use of artificial intelligence (AI) (man machine relationship) regarding organizational behavior. The aim of this research paper is to analyze whether the current AI is used also to replace man in “creative” activities. Design/methodology/approach This study is based on a qualitative and explorative approach. It is made a review of the literature with “Scopus” and “Web of Science” databases. The research fields are AI, organizational behavior, man-machine relationship and creativity. Findings Analyzing whether the intensive use of AI in organizational behavior can replace human work in creative activities. Research limitations/implications The connection of AI with creative activities within the organization is only just beginning. For this reason, other sources, like Harvard Business Review, public reports and professional papers found on the internet have been considered. The most important limitation of this paper is that all the results presented here do not concern a single case study. Practical implications In this paper, there are some examples that can show the use of AI in creative activities; however, this does not complete the situation facing companies in any sector because the AI technologies used within enterprises are constantly evolving. It is possible to continue to do research in this field. Originality/value The paper is meaningful because highlights the development of AI toward creative activities typically of human resources. It is also interesting because it analyzes the exploratory use of AI in increasingly human work, generating positive and negative externalities.

AI and public contests: a model to improve the evaluation and selection of public contest candidates in the Police Force

“…The main concern is ensuring that the system is fair with extra features to reduce the bias presented, transparent and facilitate their application process. According to Paesano (2021), there are five complementary value-based principles for proper monitoring of reliable AI, and transparency and explainability are among them. The author also refers that it should demonstrate how accessible to users the technology’s internal logic and fundamental principles are, as this is thought to be essential for fostering trust in new technology.…”

Research from RPA Advancement to AI Intelligent Automation Development: Taking the Accounting Service Industry in Taiwan as an Example

“…It is suggested that when the accounting service industry faces a new working environment in the future, it should cultivate the strategic thinking ability of process automation, encourage unique creativity, and have the courage to break through the previous work thinking to have a more vital knowledge in the transformation process. Adaptability enables the accounting services industry to co-build collaborative models of workforce and robotics, proactively addressing the challenges posed by digital transformation (Paesano, 2021).…”

Integrating artificial intelligence into a talent management model to increase the work engagement and performance of enterprises

“…AI algorithms are made by humans, they can have built-in biases from those they inadvertently or intentionally introduce into the algorithm. In the event that artificial intelligence algorithms are built biased, they will produce biased results (Tambe et al, 2019;Paesano, 2021). AI may be that some important aspects are not included in the algorithm or that it is programmed to reflect and reproduce a structural bias.…”

“…Thus, artificial intelligence improves employees' engagement levels and helps them learn faster (Kashive et al, 2021). Additionally, enterprises can use artificial intelligence to track employee progress and provide feedback accordingly (Paesano, 2021). This will help employees feel more supported, motivated, and engaged as they develop their skills (Wijayati et al, 2022).…”