2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial intelligence and speedy trial in the judiciary: Myth, reality or need? A case study in the Brazilian Supreme Court (STF)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They proposed a framework model that combines resources and impacts of AI on the velocity of legal decisions. The result demonstrated how and what solutions contribute to judgment, pre-trial, and legal support [8].…”
Section: Descriptive Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They proposed a framework model that combines resources and impacts of AI on the velocity of legal decisions. The result demonstrated how and what solutions contribute to judgment, pre-trial, and legal support [8].…”
Section: Descriptive Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The system contributes greatly to the information flow between courts [7]. Thanks to the application of emerging techniques (e.g., big data, cloud computing, and Internet AI), much progress has been made in civil litigation procedures, especially in terms of intelligent judgment, online service, smart court, and Internet court development [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Improved services. The application of digital technology in government has improved some services, such as user-centric service improvement [21], an open platform for government service delivery [40], and speedy trials in the judiciary [41]. (2) Better relationships.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, it is thought that the supposed increase in bureaucratic promptness brought on by AI is real. It is possible, but there are some restrictions because of the path length to go between using this technology for simple functioning farm duties and multifarious tasks like comprehensive process evaluation (De Sousa, et al, 2022). In the legal industry, some artificial intelligence has demonstrated prediction accuracy that is superior to that of human judges.…”
Section: Artificial Intelligence's Effects On the Legal Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%