2022
DOI: 10.32604/cmc.2022.021299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial Intelligence Enabled Apple Leaf Disease Classification for Precision Agriculture

Abstract: Precision agriculture enables the recent technological advancements in farming sector to observe, measure, and analyze the requirements of individual fields and crops. The recent developments of computer vision and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques find a way for effective detection of plants, diseases, weeds, pests, etc. On the other hand, the detection of plant diseases, particularly apple leaf diseases using AI techniques can improve productivity and reduce crop loss. Besides, earlier and precise appl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even the accuracy of the YOLO V5 model used by Mathew and Mahesh ( 2022 ) was 4.8% lower than our study. By comparing the model accuracy of the different number of disease categories, the model accuracy of Zhang et al ( 2020 ), Gao et al ( 2021 ), Sharma et al ( 2021 ), Zhao et al ( 2021 ), and Al-Wesabi et al ( 2022 ) is higher than our results, which is due to the smaller number of disease categories (up to 10 categories). Our study required the identification of up to 59 plant disease categories, which exceeded at least 85% of the disease categories in other studies and reduced the accuracy by up to 4.5% relative to other studies.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Even the accuracy of the YOLO V5 model used by Mathew and Mahesh ( 2022 ) was 4.8% lower than our study. By comparing the model accuracy of the different number of disease categories, the model accuracy of Zhang et al ( 2020 ), Gao et al ( 2021 ), Sharma et al ( 2021 ), Zhao et al ( 2021 ), and Al-Wesabi et al ( 2022 ) is higher than our results, which is due to the smaller number of disease categories (up to 10 categories). Our study required the identification of up to 59 plant disease categories, which exceeded at least 85% of the disease categories in other studies and reduced the accuracy by up to 4.5% relative to other studies.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…The higher central aspect of C1 indicates that the articles published within the scope of agriculture, article, and classification are concerned more with crop classification. Some of the recent publications within C1 focus on digital soil mapping (Lagacherie et al, 2022), an intelligence-based approach for agricultural soil prediction (Nguyen et al, 2022), AI-based apple leaf disease classification (Al-Wesabi et al, 2022), and simulating various water-deficit regimes for irrigation scheduling optimization (Martínez-Valderrama et al, 2020). Recent publications indicate that C1 is more inclined toward procedures and classification of multiple aspects of agriculture segments.…”
Section: Thematic Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model produced a better performance than support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbour (K-NN), random forest (RF), and logistic regression (LR) techniques. On the other hand, the authors in [ 13 ] used a capsule network with a bidirectional long short-term memory model for the classification of apple leaf diseases. The classification performance of their model was better than that of the standard machine learning techniques.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%