2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial intelligence techniques for embryo and oocyte classification

Abstract: One of the most relevant aspects in assisted reproduction technology is the possibility of characterizing and identifying the most viable oocytes or embryos. In most cases, embryologists select them by visual examination and their evaluation is totally subjective. Recently, due to the rapid growth in the capacity to extract texture descriptors from a given image, a growing interest has been shown in the use of artificial intelligence methods for embryo or oocyte scoring/selection in IVF programmes. This work c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
77
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
77
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This analysis was performed ten times (tenfold cross‐validation of the FANN), and allowed to determine the fairness of the recognition as “True‐SN recognition rate” (specificity), “True‐NSN recognition rate” (sensitivity), and “SN‐NSN overall recognition rate” (accuracy). FANN specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy reflect the classification performance—that is a parameter ≤100% and ≥90% equals excellent performance; <90% and ≥80% is good; <80% and ≥70% is fair; <70% and ≥60% is poor; <60% and ≥50% is a failure (Manna, Nanni, Lumini, & Pappalardo, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis was performed ten times (tenfold cross‐validation of the FANN), and allowed to determine the fairness of the recognition as “True‐SN recognition rate” (specificity), “True‐NSN recognition rate” (sensitivity), and “SN‐NSN overall recognition rate” (accuracy). FANN specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy reflect the classification performance—that is a parameter ≤100% and ≥90% equals excellent performance; <90% and ≥80% is good; <80% and ≥70% is fair; <70% and ≥60% is poor; <60% and ≥50% is a failure (Manna, Nanni, Lumini, & Pappalardo, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the attributes of 'optimal embryos' and the methods to identify embryos with a high developmental potential are still unknown entities (Cruz et al, 2012). In most cases, embryologists select embryos by visual examination and their evaluation is totally subjective and has several limitations (Manna et al, 2013;Montag et al, 2013;Santos Filho et al;, Freour et al, 2012.…”
Section: Embryo Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies exist that utilize novel imaging techniques to visualize or quantify intracellular components of gametes and embryos with the intent of correlating localization of organelles or molecular constitution with quality or outcome (Manna et al, 2013;Jasensky et al, 2011).…”
Section: Embryo Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These features provide a depth of analysis that is not otherwise readily detectable; five features of particular interest are the degree of both local and global homogeneity, heterogeneity, smoothness, and randomness (Ou et al, ). A number of machine learning techniques are starting to be applied to the analysis of phase‐contrast images of embryos for noninvasive embryo quality analysis (Manna et al, ; Hernandez‐Gonzalez et al, ), but have not yet been used to survey fluorescence images of embryos.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%