Artificial intelligence versus human - a threat or a necessity of evolution?

Abstract

Currently, technologies are actively shaping and intensifying the time of implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) systems, while at the same time the so-called soft skills that employers are looking for in future employees are becoming increasingly important. Thus, in today's situation, we have the possibility to use automatons and robots that successfully replace humans in many tasks, while at the same time there is a need to create teams based on such qualities as empathy, communication, ingenuity, intelligence and, above all, humanism, whose importance in creating a business perspective cannot be overestimated. The aim of this article is to analyse the research problem in case of social robots and the probable legal status of artificial intelligence in the future. The article will discuss the differences between artificial intelligence versus artificial consciousness. AI poses societal challenges, it is currently undergoing a number of important developments, and the law must be rapidly changed. Firstly, the difference between artificial intelligence and artificial consciousness is attempted to be demystified. Subsequently, the analysis of current legal status of Artificial Intelligence in EU will be conducted. Cyberspace and the Internet revolutionised human life. It brings benefits, but also hitherto unknown risks. However, this is an inherent problem of human development. Every new technology, every new invention has its advantages, but also disadvantages. It would seem that autonomous systems, using artificial intelligence, are a panacea for such problems. Perhaps so, but the security of cyberspace depends on a variety of factors that are sometimes beyond our control or, from another perspective, we ourselves create the threat, inspire it intentionally or through inadequacies, ignorance, and negligence.

Where Are the Changes in Eu Cybersecurity Legislation Leading?

“…Cybercrime is distinguished from classic crime primarily by operating in a computer technology environment and using computer networks to commit a crime (Bossong, 2018). Its distinguishing feature, on the other hand, is not the protection of a single common good (Oleksiewicz, 2020). Today, almost every illegal activity is reflected on the Internet.…”

“…Cyberterrorism and its threats are asymmetric and transnational (Dela 2020: Oleksiewicz, 2020. Counteracting the phenomenon is not a simple issue, because it is necessary to carry out systemic activities on many levels.…”

“…At the same time, policy and strategy tend to be volatile, dynamic, and constantly updated (most often as part of the so-called strategic review, which periodically revises the assumptions of the strategy). The relationship between policy and strategy, that is, the long-term concept of political action and the practical methods of their implementation in time and space with the use of available, potential, and created forces and means, is at the same time a fundamental factor in shaping the existence and development of the state (Oleksiewicz, 2022).…”

“…It was noted that the EU's resilience of critical infrastructures should be increased and strengthened through close cooperation and coordination between the relevant actors, including between civilian and European military actors. There is also a need to strengthen close cooperation and coordination in responding to cyber incidents by defense actors, law enforcement agencies, the private sector, and cybersecurity authorities to successfully tackle cyber challenges (Oleksiewicz, 2021).…”