2019
DOI: 10.3233/jifs-181604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial neural networks approaches for predicting the potential for hydropower generation: a case study for Amazon region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using Adam optimizer to train the models at different calibrations, error rates from RNN and LSTM were higher (i.e., RMSE ranged from 14 to 20), compared with GMDH-type ANN (RMSE of 0.09). In line with our observations, many studies [ 24 , 25 , 34 , 35 ] have also demonstrated the superiority of GMDH-type ANN over both RNN and LSTM. In addition, we observed that RNN and LSTM algorithms might be less suitable because of the few data points available for this study, coupled with the problems of gradient vanishing and gradient explosion (i.e., accumulation of large error gradients leading to unstable models).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using Adam optimizer to train the models at different calibrations, error rates from RNN and LSTM were higher (i.e., RMSE ranged from 14 to 20), compared with GMDH-type ANN (RMSE of 0.09). In line with our observations, many studies [ 24 , 25 , 34 , 35 ] have also demonstrated the superiority of GMDH-type ANN over both RNN and LSTM. In addition, we observed that RNN and LSTM algorithms might be less suitable because of the few data points available for this study, coupled with the problems of gradient vanishing and gradient explosion (i.e., accumulation of large error gradients leading to unstable models).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…GMDH-type ANN was purposefully selected from the class of deep learning algorithms because of its robustness against incorrect, noisy, and small dataset [ 33 ]. Also, recent studies in other disciplines have demonstrated its superiority over RNN and LSTM [ 24 , 25 , 34 , 35 ]. P -value < 0.05 and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to assess statistical significance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following the success of neural networks in many areas [9,10], the departing hypothesis of this paper is that ANN models can better capture the dynamics of hydroelectric production and, therefore, provide better results in our use case-even though the number of observations is not very large. In the literature, there are a few contributions studying hydroelectric production in countries such as China, Serbia, and Brazil [5,11,12]. Still, there are no similar studies in the literature applying recurrent neural networks and focused on a medium-size region during a large period in which the installed capacity has evolved, as is the case in Ecuador.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the correlation values between the observed and predicted energies, Abdulkadir et al [7] justified the use of neural network approaches in modelling the hydropower generation as a function of reservoir variables at two reservoirs along the River Niger in Nigeria. Developing predictive models of the hydropower generation in the Amazon, Lopes et al [8] presented a comparative analysis between polynomial and ANNs using rainfall as the only input. Using three algorithms, group method of data handling (GMDH), ANN with Levenberg-Marquardt (ANN-LM), and ANN with Bayesian regulation (ANN-BR), it was shown that GMDH is the most appropriate algorithm to optimize the model result because of its adroitness in selecting the variables at the model entry layer and that ANN-LM algorithm failed to live up to expectations due to largely dispersed data and less accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%