2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-28495-8_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial Neural Networks as Models of Robustness in Development and Regeneration: Stability of Memory During Morphological Remodeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, Glassman (1987) estimates that at least half of the neurons in the human brain fit under our definition of frivolous. The neural activity of DNNs for object recognition has been shown to resemble neural activity in parts of the brain (Yamins and DiCarlo 2016), and several works have aimed to understand redundancy and robustness in brains using artificial networks as models (Schuster 2008;Aerts et al 2016;Hammelman, Lobo, and Levin 2016). Thus, the framework presented in this paper could be helpful to understand prunability and redundancy in brains and how biological networks implicitly regularize.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, Glassman (1987) estimates that at least half of the neurons in the human brain fit under our definition of frivolous. The neural activity of DNNs for object recognition has been shown to resemble neural activity in parts of the brain (Yamins and DiCarlo 2016), and several works have aimed to understand redundancy and robustness in brains using artificial networks as models (Schuster 2008;Aerts et al 2016;Hammelman, Lobo, and Levin 2016). Thus, the framework presented in this paper could be helpful to understand prunability and redundancy in brains and how biological networks implicitly regularize.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%