2022
DOI: 10.1002/ese3.1144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial neural networks model for predicting the behavior of different injection pressure characteristics powered by blend of biofuel‐nano emulsion

Abstract: This investigation deals with the usage of graphene oxide (GO) nanoparticles with orange peel biodiesel in a conventional CI engine. The different fuel blends used for this experiment are biodiesel 10% + diesel 80% + ethanol 5% + surfactant 5% + GO 50 ppm (B10), biodiesel 20% + diesel 70% + ethanol 5% + surfactant 5% + GO 50 ppm (B20), biodiesel 50% + diesel 40% + ethanol 5% + surfactant 5% + GO 50 ppm (B50) and B100. The addition of ethanol has dual benefits for improving the vaporization of fuel blends and r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table 6, mesh-independence analysis was used to optimize the mesh size. The mesh size was adjusted when further meshing did not affect the simulated data [52][53][54][55][56]. Two million cells were chosen because there was no additional enhancement in the solution after such count, based on consistent with the experimental information.…”
Section: Methodology Of Cfd Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 6, mesh-independence analysis was used to optimize the mesh size. The mesh size was adjusted when further meshing did not affect the simulated data [52][53][54][55][56]. Two million cells were chosen because there was no additional enhancement in the solution after such count, based on consistent with the experimental information.…”
Section: Methodology Of Cfd Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since GP and SVM-Schotastic model performed the best among the other models for FS and CS for this dataset, sensitivity analysis was carried out on it by changing the input combination and taking out one input parameter at a time, as shown in Table 9 and Table 10 . Statistical assessment metrics such as CC, MAE, and RMSE were used to assess each model’s performance [ 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 ]. Table 9 and Table 10 , demonstrates that the number of curing days followed by CA, C, w and MP is critical in predicting the flexural and compressive strength of a concrete mix.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The static model is fitted on the surface and based on those observations; independent variables are analyzed. The contour plots exhibit the optimum values of responses [ 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 ].…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%