2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2017.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial periosteum in bone defect repair—A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 6 , 49 The porous structure is beneficial for rapid diffusion of nutrients throughout the network, improving the efficacy in cell attachment, proliferation, and migration. 7 , 50 , 51 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 6 , 49 The porous structure is beneficial for rapid diffusion of nutrients throughout the network, improving the efficacy in cell attachment, proliferation, and migration. 7 , 50 , 51 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different strategies have been applied to produce composites for bone repair using different calcium phosphates, some of which are associated with bone morphogenetic protein. The literature shows that nHAp is bioactive and biocompatible, but its physicochemical properties lead to a smaller surface area and bioactivity than the nanocomposites prepared herein . The nHAp/GNR (containing 2 wt %/wt of GNR) nanocomposite produces a 3.4 nm pore diameter (Figure S2d), which is a very interesting result that may contribute to enhanced bone neoformation compared to nHAp (pore diameter of 6.8, Figure S2d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, bone defects caused by trauma are often accompanied by periosteal damage. Periosteum is consisted of fibrous layer and osteogenic layer [5][6][7]. Usually, the fibrous layer is responsible for providing nourishment to cells via its capillary network and whilst original cells attached on the bone surface will continue to differentiate [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%