2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ASASSN-15oi: a rapidly evolving, luminous tidal disruption event at 216 Mpc

Abstract: We present ground-based and Swift photometric and spectroscopic observations of the tidal disruption event (TDE) ASASSN-15oi, discovered at the center of 2MASX J20390918-3045201 (d 216 Mpc) by the All-Sky Automated Survey for SuperNovae (ASAS-SN). The source peaked at a bolometric luminosity of L 1.3 × 10 44 ergs s −1 and radiated a total energy of E 6.6 × 10 50 ergs over the first ∼ 3.5 months of observations. The early optical/UV emission of the source can be fit by a blackbody with temperature increasing fr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
106
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
12
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this limit is significantly fainter than the luminous X-ray emission observed from ASASSN-14li (Holoien et al 2016b;van Velzen et al 2016a), it is comparable to the much fainter emission observed from ASASSN-15oi (L X = 4.8 × 10 41 erg s −1 ; Holoien et al 2016a). Furthermore,it is several orders of magnitude above the faint X-ray emission observed at the location of iPTF16fnl (L X = 2.4 × 10 39 erg s −1 ; Blagorodnova et al 2017).…”
Section: Swift Uvot and Xrt Photometrymentioning
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While this limit is significantly fainter than the luminous X-ray emission observed from ASASSN-14li (Holoien et al 2016b;van Velzen et al 2016a), it is comparable to the much fainter emission observed from ASASSN-15oi (L X = 4.8 × 10 41 erg s −1 ; Holoien et al 2016a). Furthermore,it is several orders of magnitude above the faint X-ray emission observed at the location of iPTF16fnl (L X = 2.4 × 10 39 erg s −1 ; Blagorodnova et al 2017).…”
Section: Swift Uvot and Xrt Photometrymentioning
confidence: 48%
“…We then compare its properties with 11 TDE candidates discovered in UV and optical sky surveys with well-sampled optical light curves: D1-9 and D3-13 from GALEX+CFHTLS (Gezari et al 2008), TDE1 and TDE2 from SDSS (van Velzen et al 2011), PTF09ge from PTF (Arcavi et al 2014), PS1-10jh (Gezari et al 2012), and PS1-11af (Chornock et al 2014) from GALEX+Pan-STARRS1, ASASSN-14ae (Holoien et al 2014), ASASSN-14li (Holoien et al 2016b), and ASASSN-15oi (Holoien et al 2016a) from ASASSN, and iPTF16fnl (Blagorodnova et al 2017). The luminosities, temperatures, and radii of the three ASASSN candidate TDEs (ASASSN-14ae, ASASSN-14li, ASASSN-15oi) are provided by T. Holoien via private communication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) The light curve of iPTF 16bco shows a complex shape uncharacteristic of a TDE, with a month-long plateau, followed by a 2-week rise to another plateau. (4) The broad Balmer lines in iPTF 16bco are narrower and stronger than have been observed in TDEs, and iPTF 16bco does not have strong, broad He II l4686, which is characteristic of TDE spectra (Gezari et al 2012;Arcavi et al 2014;Holoien et al 2014Holoien et al , 2016aHoloien et al , 2016b. (5) Finally, the broad-line emission and X-ray continuum in iPTF 16bco are consistent with radio-quiet quasars in the "Eigenvector 1" parameter space: the FWHM velocity width of the broad Hβ line versus the ratio of the equivalent widths of the Fe II λ4570 complex to broad Hβ strength (R Fe II ) (Sulentic et al 2000) favors a change inṀ acc of a preexisting accretion disk, instead of a newly formed debris disk from a TDE.…”
Section: Tidal Disruption Event (Tde)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the rapid rise and power-law decline of its light curve were interpreted as a signature of a TDE (Merloni et al 2015). However, the light curves of iPTF 16bco and the other changing-look quasars with archival photometry have large fluctuations that are inconsistent with the smooth, power-law decline observed in the optical light curves of known TDEs (e.g., Gezari et al 2008;van Velzen et al 2011;Gezari et al 2012;Arcavi et al 2014;Holoien et al 2014Holoien et al , 2016aHoloien et al , 2016b. The erratic intraburst behavior in the twostate (hot and cold) α instability models of Siemiginowska et al (1996) could be promising.…”
Section: Accretion Disk Instabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Piran et al 2015 (P15); Roth et al 2016;Dai et al 2015;etc.). In some of the best-studied events, the optical/UV blackbody radius is much larger than the tidal radius, and the temperature remains roughly constant over much of the evolution (e.g., Chornock et al 2014;Holoien et al 2016b). Because TDFs are basically accreting supermassive black holes, the natural inclination is to expect the same mechanisms operating in AGN, namely, X-ray reprocessing, thermal emission from the inner radii of the accretion disk, etc., to also operate in TDFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%