2020
DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16339.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ascertaining and classifying cases of congenital anomalies in the ALSPAC birth cohort

Abstract: Congenital anomalies (CAs) are structural or functional disorders that occur during intrauterine life. Longitudinal cohort studies provide unique opportunities to investigate potential causes and consequences of these disorders. In this data note, we describe how we identified cases of major CAs, with a specific focus on congenital heart diseases (CHDs), in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). We demonstrate that combining multiple sources of data including data from antenatal, deliver… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

6
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the ALSPAC cohort, cases were obtained from a range of data sources, including health record linkage and questionnaire data up until age 25 following European surveillance of congenital anomalies (EUROCAT) guidelines 31 . In BiB, cases were identified from either the Yorkshire and Humber congenital anomaly register database, which will tend to pick up most cases that diagnosed antenatally and in the early postnatal period of life, and through linkage to primary care (up until aged 5), which will have picked up any additional cases, in particular those that might have been less severe and not identified antenatally/in early life 32 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the ALSPAC cohort, cases were obtained from a range of data sources, including health record linkage and questionnaire data up until age 25 following European surveillance of congenital anomalies (EUROCAT) guidelines 31 . In BiB, cases were identified from either the Yorkshire and Humber congenital anomaly register database, which will tend to pick up most cases that diagnosed antenatally and in the early postnatal period of life, and through linkage to primary care (up until aged 5), which will have picked up any additional cases, in particular those that might have been less severe and not identified antenatally/in early life 32 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the ABCD cohort, data on CHDs in liveborn children were obtained from three different sources: (i) the infant questionnaire, which was filled out by the mother at an average infant age of 12.9 weeks, (ii) the questionnaire filled out by the mother at an average infant age of 5.1 years, and (iii) clinical data of the Youth Health Care Registration. In the ALSPAC cohort, cases were obtained from a range of data sources, including health record linkage and questionnaire data up until age 25 following European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies (EUROCAT) guidelines 26 . In BASELINE, at 2 months, mothers were asked of any medical problems and/or referrals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transferring and discharging was also done from within the STORK Maternity system. There is a link between STORK and the SWRHA Child Health database 7 : which was used to track early-years child development and routine healthcare (e.g. vaccinations, school nurse visits).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The view of the report is that the paper abstracted ALSPAC obstetric and paediatric records were generally more reliable and more complete than the early STORK data. The abstracted records are only available as a full electronic dataset for specific detailed variables such as longitudinal measures of maternal weight and blood pressure, diagnosis of pre-eclampsia; Other details of pregnancy have been abstracted from the medical records for 8,369 pregnancies 7 . The benefit of the STORK data is that it is readily available in an electronic format, although the accuracy of many of the variables is imperfect.…”
Section: Dataset Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%