2016
DOI: 10.1353/jda.2016.0091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ASEANi plus six and Successful FTAs: Can India propel intra-industry trade flows?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Panagariya (2018) argued that a bilateral deficit with China can get compensated by a trade surplus with another country and cheap imports are needed to boost the manufacturing sector in India. Similar arguments are proposed by Das et al (2016) who showed that greater intra-industry trade (IIT) with RCEP may be sustainable; by Ahmad et al (2018) who suggested a huge potential for Sino-Indian trade that could benefit both the countries despite China's dominance. Other studies argued that India may not gain much from RCEP, due to tight Intellectual property controls (Bhutani, 2017), lack of service trade liberalization in RCEP which is important for India (Chakraborty et al, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Panagariya (2018) argued that a bilateral deficit with China can get compensated by a trade surplus with another country and cheap imports are needed to boost the manufacturing sector in India. Similar arguments are proposed by Das et al (2016) who showed that greater intra-industry trade (IIT) with RCEP may be sustainable; by Ahmad et al (2018) who suggested a huge potential for Sino-Indian trade that could benefit both the countries despite China's dominance. Other studies argued that India may not gain much from RCEP, due to tight Intellectual property controls (Bhutani, 2017), lack of service trade liberalization in RCEP which is important for India (Chakraborty et al, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 52%