2019
DOI: 10.33788/sr.17.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asistența socială în România după 25 de ani: răspuns la problemele tranziției

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Type designs [32], chosen for their ease of construction, resulted in diverse collective housing categories, point, slab, or tower with H, T, L, or U sections, arranged as shown in Figure 3. However, a problem emerged with the neglect of the local context, leading to "matchbox" buildings, negatively impacting both architectural and urban aesthetics and residents' perceptions [39]. At the urban design scale, the collective housing layout generates variants that must be adapted to the context, considering the landscape type: compositions such as rectangular, loose, linear layout, enclosed layout, or compact layout.…”
Section: Collective Housing In Socialist Romania Different Types Acco...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type designs [32], chosen for their ease of construction, resulted in diverse collective housing categories, point, slab, or tower with H, T, L, or U sections, arranged as shown in Figure 3. However, a problem emerged with the neglect of the local context, leading to "matchbox" buildings, negatively impacting both architectural and urban aesthetics and residents' perceptions [39]. At the urban design scale, the collective housing layout generates variants that must be adapted to the context, considering the landscape type: compositions such as rectangular, loose, linear layout, enclosed layout, or compact layout.…”
Section: Collective Housing In Socialist Romania Different Types Acco...mentioning
confidence: 99%