26th Aerospace Sciences Meeting 1988
DOI: 10.2514/6.1988-612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspect ratio and Reynolds number effects on the flow behind a rearward-facing step

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the AR is too small it is possible that the side walls of the test section could adversely effect the flow over the step. de Brederode and Bradshaw (1972) found that the lower limit for ignoring the effects due to AR was 10, but Ellzey and Berbee (1988) found little or no effect down to values as low as 4. The second parameter, the expansion ratio, is defined as the ratio, relative to the step, of the downstream to upstream cross sectional areas.…”
Section: Installed In the Subsonic Wind Tunnelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the AR is too small it is possible that the side walls of the test section could adversely effect the flow over the step. de Brederode and Bradshaw (1972) found that the lower limit for ignoring the effects due to AR was 10, but Ellzey and Berbee (1988) found little or no effect down to values as low as 4. The second parameter, the expansion ratio, is defined as the ratio, relative to the step, of the downstream to upstream cross sectional areas.…”
Section: Installed In the Subsonic Wind Tunnelmentioning
confidence: 99%