2015
DOI: 10.4067/s0716-10182015000700007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspectos clínico-epidemiológicos de la toxoplasmosis en pacientes que consultan por problemas de visión

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
6
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
6
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, such spatial methodology should be used for other zoonotic diseases to holistically evaluate the role of the household setting on the disease cycle and epidemiology. Despite previous reports [5359], the consumption of raw meat and unwashed or raw fruits or vegetables were not associated herein with T . gondii seropositivity in human beings.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Moreover, such spatial methodology should be used for other zoonotic diseases to holistically evaluate the role of the household setting on the disease cycle and epidemiology. Despite previous reports [5359], the consumption of raw meat and unwashed or raw fruits or vegetables were not associated herein with T . gondii seropositivity in human beings.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…The prevalence of toxoplasmosis was evaluated in ocular patients, the result demonstrated that around half of patients were infected with toxoplasmosis, but most cases were chronic and only a couple of cases were acute or recurred with low IgM titer, based on serological test, It was found 43.1% were positive for IgG, while 1.1% for IgM. These findings could be due to the patient's visit ophthalmologist weeks or months after T. gondii infection and the titer of IgM In the present investigation, from 80 seropositive patients, only 10 (2 males and 8 females) (12.5%) presented ocular toxoplasmosis as an old or active lesion, this result closely resemble with the result of Samudio et al (2015) in Brazil whom recorded 6 (5 males and 1 females) (8.9%) of ocular toxoplasmosis lesion among 80 ocular toxoplasmosis patients [23]. According to a new research that was done in 2020, the prevalence of retinochoroidal scars was higher in female patients than in males [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…However, it may be related to the host when the patient re-infected after consuming contaminated foods, bursting the old scar after altering in host immune status or the new strain can be blamed for the recurrence. People who did not get effective treatment have a greater chance of recurrence and producing new lesions beside the old ones [31,32], and continuous multiplication of the parasite within the tissue cyst and rupturing as a result after a long time of infection and this leads to the formation of new lesions [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sin embargo, cuando se compara con otro estudio realizado también en Paraguay pero en pacientes con problemas de visión, los resultados son similares, considerando que en ese estudio la frecuencia de toxoplasmosis ocular fue de 7,5% (6/80), y la frecuencia en los 67 pacientes seropositivos fue del 8,9% (13). Las cifras de la frecuencia de toxoplasmosis ocular en otros países de América del Sur, son también similares, así en Colombia, De la Torre et al en una muestra poblacional de 200 individuos entre estudiantes y trabajadores en una Universidad del Quindío, con edades comprendidas entre los 18 y 45 años y encontraron que el 6% de ellos (12 pacientes) presentaba cicatrices retinianas por toxoplasma (4); adicional a esto, otras observaciones han surgido a partir de los estudios poblacionales con muestras significativas de 1042 personas en un área rural Erechim con alta tasa de toxoplasmosis (una ciudad agrícola situada en una región del sur de Brasil [Rio Grande do Sul]), mostrando una prevalencia del 17% de lesiones oculares que eran compatibles con toxoplasmosis (8) (y predomina el tipo I T. gondii).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified