2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspects of adhesion tests on resin–glass ceramic bonding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, cutting the sintered zirconia specimen into a micro-tensile bond strength sample might involve heat and water, which may induce surface flaws, grains enlargement [38] and possibly t→m transformation. As such, other test methods such as flexural bond strength test [12] that have higher sensitivity could be utilized. Further studies are necessary as these tests are rarely performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, cutting the sintered zirconia specimen into a micro-tensile bond strength sample might involve heat and water, which may induce surface flaws, grains enlargement [38] and possibly t→m transformation. As such, other test methods such as flexural bond strength test [12] that have higher sensitivity could be utilized. Further studies are necessary as these tests are rarely performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some clinical studies have reported restoration debonding as a type of failure [9]. Unlike silica-based ceramics, which can be hydrofluoric acid (HF)-etched, followed by silane coupling agent application before resin cementation that yields high resin-ceramic bond strength [10][11][12], zirconia is inherently non silica-based, chemically inert, and resists HF treatment with the exception of high temperature HF treatment [13]. Therefore, it is difficult to achieve a strong resin bonding to zirconia with silanes [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Inside the blade: cracks at the bonding resin, missing adhesive, discontinuities on the sandwich, delaminations within the glass fiber reinforced plastics (GFRP) [45] or the sandwich [46], cracks on the web, excess bonding resin [47], problems in the bonding, waves, air inclusions, etc.…”
Section: There Are Several Types Of Blade Damage Depending On the Locmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ceramics have increasingly become the best option of esthetic restoration of dental structures. The factors that have contributed to the choice of this material are mechanical strength, biocompatibility and esthetics (ZOGHEIB et al, 2011;WONG et al, 2017;HAKIMANEH, 2018). Current ceramic systems include lithium disilicate, glass infiltrated alumina and zirconia, and high-density alumina or zirconia ceramic systems (SANTOS et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%