“…Many contemporary analysts consider theoretically and clinically problematic the forceful splitting propounded by Greenson (1968) termed 'disidenti cation from the mother' and 'counter-identi cation with the father' (for example, Fast, 1984Fast, , 1990Fast, , 1995Fast, , 1999Fast, , 2001Benjamin, 1988Benjamin, , 1991Benjamin, , 1996Pollack, 1995Pollack, , 1998Christiansen, 1996;Axelrod, 1997;Diamond, 1998Diamond, , 2001Diamond, , 2004Wilkinson, 2001). Building on Fast's seminal work (1984,1990,1999), I wish to add to this dialogue by highlighting the complex pre-oedipal and oedipal internalizations that help each boy create his unique sense of maleness while considering two key issues that those employing Greenson's pre-oedipal theory failed to take adequately into account: rst, the desirability and unavoidability of the boy's earliest, pre-oedipal identi cations with both parents; and second, the unconscious, intrapsychic foundation for such internalization, especially as the boy's identi cation with his mother re ects the recovery of lost or disrupted aspects of a gratifying object relationship.…”