2013
DOI: 10.1134/s1560354713060178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspects of the planetary Birkhoff normal form

Abstract: The discovery in [G. Pinzari. PhD thesis. Univ. Roma Tre. 2009], [L. Chierchia and G. Pinzari, Invent. Math. 2011] of the Birkhoff normal form for the planetary many--body problem opened new insights and hopes for the comprehension of the dynamics of this problem. Remarkably, it allowed to give a {\sl direct} proof of the celebrated Arnold's Theorem [V. I. Arnold. Uspehi Math. Nauk. 1963] on the stability of planetary motions. In this paper, using a "ad hoc" set of symplectic variables, we develop an asymptoti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The canonical character of K follows from [13]. Indeed, in [13], we considered a set of coordinates for the three-body problem 4 , that here 5 we denote as P = (Z, C, R, R, Θ, Φ, z, g, r, r, ϑ, ϕ), that are related to K above via the canonical change where ξ = ξ(Λ, G, ), ν = ν(Λ, G, ) are, respectively, the eccentric and the true anomaly, defined below (see (27), (29)).…”
Section: K Coordinatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The canonical character of K follows from [13]. Indeed, in [13], we considered a set of coordinates for the three-body problem 4 , that here 5 we denote as P = (Z, C, R, R, Θ, Φ, z, g, r, r, ϑ, ϕ), that are related to K above via the canonical change where ξ = ξ(Λ, G, ), ν = ν(Λ, G, ) are, respectively, the eccentric and the true anomaly, defined below (see (27), (29)).…”
Section: K Coordinatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The canonical character of K follows from [13]. Indeed, in [13], we considered a set of coordinates for the three-body problem 4 , that here 5 we denote as P = (Z, C, R, R, Θ, Φ, z, g, r, r, ϑ, ϕ), that are related to K above via the canonical change where ξ = ξ(Λ, G, ), ν = ν(Λ, G, ) are, respectively, the eccentric and the true anomaly, defined below (see (27), (29)). Since the map D e ,pl in (24) and the coordinates P of [13] are canonical, so is K. Observe, incidentally, the unusual π 2 -shift in (25), due to the fact that, according to the definitions in (23), g is the longitude of M × P in the plane of i 3 , j 3 , relatively to i 3 .…”
Section: K Coordinatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3/2 (α) with α, a 2 as in (7), (35), and, as usual, b (j) s (α)'s being the Laplace coefficients, defined via the Fourier expansion…”
Section: Birkhoff Theory In the Partially Reduced Retrograde Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of a positive measure set of Lagrangian tori with maximal number (see the next section) of frequencies for the general planetary problem, in the regime of well spaced orbits, small eccentricities and small inclinations, has been established in the papers Refs. 3,9,12,22,[33][34][35] . We refer to such technical papers for details, to Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation