Aspek Hukum Layanan Sertifikat Tanah Elektronik

Abstract

Modernization of electronic-based land services is a means of increasing indicators of ease of public service to the community. This is implemented by optimizing the use of information and communication technology. This article discusses the legal pitfalls of regulating electronic certificates and the prerequisites for implementing electronic certificates. From this legal blemish, there is formal legal disregard for the fundamental agrarian Law (UUPA) because it is not a source of reference in regulating electronic certificates and electronic land registration, and there are regulatory inconsistencies in the UUPA in substance. On the other hand, the regulation regarding analog land registration (PP No. 24 of 1997) and electronic land registration (PP No. 18 of 2021) raises the interpretation that there are two land registration systems, namely analog and electronic. PP No. 24 of 1997 was revised by issuing new arrangements that included other materials such as management rights, land rights and flats, as in PP no. 18 of 2021. Then, to carry out electronic land registration, at least three conditions must be met, namely validation of land data, electronic documents, and security of land data

Electronic title certificate as legal evidence

“…Several faction members in the DPR-RI requested the postponing of the application of electronic land certificates. The Ministerial Regulation's provision regarding e-certificates was said to have various flaws, and the government's policies had not undergone adequate planning, both of which contributed to the delay (Fadli, 2021). However, the regulation does not conflict with the above rules, namely PP No.…”

Legal Protection of Notary in The Eradication of The Land Mafia in Indonesia

“…Malicious alliances carried out in authentic deeds / certificates by the land mafia involving General Officers (Notaries or PPAT or Camata tau Lurah or Kades) which result in disputes, conflicts and land cases with broad dimensions (Andari & Mujiburohman, 2023). Illegally access land ownership data recorded in the Land Work Computerization (KKP) system of the Ministry of ATR / BPN.…”

Land Archive Authentication as a Result of Media Transfer at the Land Office

“…Previous studies have touched upon the authentication of digitally digitized archive documents, albeit mainly in the context of archival institutions. These include studies by Anindyati (2020) that examine the application of digitized archives in the Laris application and whether digital archives can replace original paper archives; Listiyani & Alamsyah (2019), which discuss efforts to preserve the authenticity of digital archives at the Archives and Library Office of Semarang Regency; Christiani & Sutrisno (2019), which analyze the authentication process of digital archives at the Archives and Library Office of Central Java Province; Setianingsih (2022), who address the authentication process of digital archives resulting from media transfer and identify challenges in implementing the authentication process due to media transfer (Mujiburohman, 2021;Muhidin et al, 2016); Rusmiatiningsih (2017Rusmiatiningsih ( & 2019, who provide interpretations of the status of electronic archives as valid evidentiary tools and the role of archivists in the legal field; Andari & Mujiburohman (2023), Wulan et al (2022), andSalim et al (2022), who delve into policy and legal arguments in the context of media transfer and its admissibility in court.…”