Aspergillosis: From Diagnosis to Prevention 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-2408-4_57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspergillus Keratitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trauma was a key predisposing factor for the infection, as it was expected based on previous reports (Kredics et al, 2007; Thomas, 2009; Manikandan et al, 2013). Additionally, Manikandan et al (2013) listed co-existing ocular conditions and systemic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension, among the risk factors for Aspergillus keratitis (Manikandan et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Trauma was a key predisposing factor for the infection, as it was expected based on previous reports (Kredics et al, 2007; Thomas, 2009; Manikandan et al, 2013). Additionally, Manikandan et al (2013) listed co-existing ocular conditions and systemic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension, among the risk factors for Aspergillus keratitis (Manikandan et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Fungal keratitis typically affects middle-aged men having agriculture-related or other outdoor occupations in developing countries. While trauma has been the key predisposing factor, diabetes mellitus, contact lens wear, corticosteroid therapy, a prior eye surgery or eye disease are also among the frequently reported other risk factors for the infection (Bharathi et al, 2007; Thomas, 2009; Thomas and Kaliamurthy, 2013; Ranjini and Waddepally, 2016). Among filamentous fungal aetiologies, the genera Fusarium (31–52.5%) and Aspergillus (11–41%) are the main pathogens (Chowdhary and Singh, 2005; Ranjini and Waddepally, 2016; Manikandan et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing may not always accurately predict the clinical response of individual fungal keratitis patients, literature data about the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antifungals against various isolates of filamentous fungi causing keratitis are highly valuable in guiding the clinicians to select the appropriate therapeutic agents . Due to the fact that the practice of subjecting fungal isolates to antifungal susceptibility tests remains uncommon across the diagnostic microbiology laboratories, and that the susceptibility pattern is depending from the involved species of Aspergillus / Fusarium as well as the nature and concentration of the drug, it is further emphasised that the isolates should compulsorily be examined for their susceptibility to increase the chances of an accurate therapy.…”
Section: Significance Of Susceptibility Testing In the Management Of mentioning
confidence: 99%