2015
DOI: 10.1021/am508858x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asphalt-Derived High Surface Area Activated Porous Carbons for Carbon Dioxide Capture

Abstract: Research activity toward the development of new sorbents for carbon dioxide (CO2) capture have been increasing quickly. Despite the variety of existing materials with high surface areas and high CO2 uptake performances, the cost of the materials remains a dominant factor in slowing their industrial applications. Here we report preparation and CO2 uptake performance of microporous carbon materials synthesized from asphalt, a very inexpensive carbon source. Carbonization of asphalt with potassium hydroxide (KOH)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
66
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
66
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Q stCO2 for our KOH activated carbon lies within 23-27.8 kJ mol À 1 (Fig. S8), which is almost comparable with benzimidazole polymers (26.7 kJ mol À 1 ) [41], Asphalt-derived carbons (20-29 kJ mol À 1 ) [42], but is lower than N-functionalized covalent organic nitridic frameworks (34 kJ mol À 1 ) [43]. Again, although KCOP-M-700 have higher BET surface area and V micro ( Table 1) than KCOP-M-600, but showed lower CO 2 adsorption, which can be explained on the difference in their Q stCO2.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Q stCO2 for our KOH activated carbon lies within 23-27.8 kJ mol À 1 (Fig. S8), which is almost comparable with benzimidazole polymers (26.7 kJ mol À 1 ) [41], Asphalt-derived carbons (20-29 kJ mol À 1 ) [42], but is lower than N-functionalized covalent organic nitridic frameworks (34 kJ mol À 1 ) [43]. Again, although KCOP-M-700 have higher BET surface area and V micro ( Table 1) than KCOP-M-600, but showed lower CO 2 adsorption, which can be explained on the difference in their Q stCO2.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…It can be seen that the total CO 2 uptake of SU-AC-400 at 30 bar (28.3 mmol g −1 ) is superior to those of the previously reported carbon materials. [10][11][12][23][24][25] Table 2 lists the CO 2 and CH 4 adsorption uptakes and CO 2 /CH 4 selectivities for the SU-AC samples. Table 3 summarizes the textual properties and high-pressure CO 2 capacities of SU-AC-400 in comparison with previously reported carbons.…”
Section: High-pressure Co 2 Capturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32] A-rNPC 2580 1.09 25.2 21.1 (40 °C) Jalilov et al [24] CPC-700 3242 1.51 25.7 -Ashourirad et al [23] HPC5b2-1100 2734 5.23 27.4 20. 4 Srinivas et al [12] SU [34,35] The significant decrease in Q st with increasing CO 2 loading reveals the heterogeneous nature of the adsorption sites.…”
Section: Isosteric Heat Of Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 To enhance the CO 2 sorption of porous carbon, various precursors (asphalt, 15 organic polymers 16 and biomass resources 17 ), optimal carbonization processes [18][19] and post-modification strategy 6 have been thoroughly investigated. Major research efforts have been focused on developing high surface area and incorporating basic sites to engineer pore surface of carbon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%