1997
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1997.444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspirin and colorectal cancer

Abstract: Summary The relationship between aspirin use and colorectal cancer risk was examined by a case-control study in Italy. Regular aspirin use was reported by only 47 (3.5%) cases and 77 (4.1%) control subjects, giving a multivariate odds ratio (OR) of 0.7 (95% Cl 0.5-1.0) after allowance for education, physical exercise and selected dietary factors.Keywords: aspirin; non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; colorectal neoplasms; pharmacoepidemiology At least six case-control studies (Kune et al, 1988;Rosenberg et a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further studies should examine the potential for a differential effect of aspirin based on anatomic location which may be related to differences in the molecular characteristics of tumors. 41 Although previous studies have demonstrated an inverse relationship between aspirin and colorectal cancer, 7,8,14,29,[35][36][37][38][39][40][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] the present study differs in several important ways. First, because we collected detailed, updated information on aspirin at a range of doses over 18 years of follow-up, we were able to evaluate long-term use across a broad range of intake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 41%
“…Further studies should examine the potential for a differential effect of aspirin based on anatomic location which may be related to differences in the molecular characteristics of tumors. 41 Although previous studies have demonstrated an inverse relationship between aspirin and colorectal cancer, 7,8,14,29,[35][36][37][38][39][40][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] the present study differs in several important ways. First, because we collected detailed, updated information on aspirin at a range of doses over 18 years of follow-up, we were able to evaluate long-term use across a broad range of intake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 41%
“…However, few prior studies have evaluated subsite-specific colorectal cancer risks among NSAID users. Studies that have evaluated the associations of NSAID use with colon and rectal cancers separately (3,4,6,11,14,37,38) have generally observed similar risk associations, although stronger associations with rectal cancer have been reported (5,7). A limited number of previous studies have also found that NSAID use is associated with a stronger inverse association for proximal compared with distal colon cancer (10,13,17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Except for a cohort study in the elderly (2), previous observational studies, both cohort and case-control studies, have shown that use of aspirin and nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are associated with reduced colorectal cancer risks (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). In contrast, the Physicians' Health Study and the Women's Health Study, the only randomized controlled trials that reported on associations between regular use of aspirin and colorectal cancer incidence, did not find any statistically significant reduction in colorectal cancer incidence with low dose aspirin use (18,19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanisms involving NSAIDs inhibitory effect on the cyclooxygenase-2 enzyme's production of various prostaglandins, resulting in modulation of inflammation and immunoresponse, induction of cell apoptosis, and inhibition of angiogenesis have been suggested (1). The majority of epidemiologic studies have addressed colorectal cancer (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10). The relation between NSAIDs and upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancers has been less studied, and the results are partly conflicting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%