“…The energy density of present device is substantially higher than those of recently reported all-solid-state symmetric SCs with electrode materials such as MoS 2 /carbon cloth (5.42 Wh/kg) 43 , GO/PPy (15.1 Wh/kg) 44 , SWCNTs/RuO 2 (18.8 Wh/kg) 36 , rGO-PEDOT/PSS (2.83 Wh/kg) 45 , MWCNTs (3.5 Wh/kg) 46 , N-doped cotton-derived carbon frameworks (NCCF)-rGO (20 Wh/kg) 47 , MoSe 2 (36.2 Wh/kg) 48 , PEDOT:PSS/MWCNT (13.2 Wh/kg) 2 , ZnS/CNTs (22.3 Wh/kg) 37 , ZnCo 2 O 4 /rGO (11.44 Wh/kg) 49 , Pt/n-CNT@PANI (30.22 Wh/kg) 50 , waste paper fibers-RGO–MnO 2 (19.6 Wh/kg) 51 , and porous carbon (7.22 Wh/kg) 52 . Due to current collector-free feature, present ultrathin device showed remarkable energy density, a value considerably higher than even solid-state asymmetric devices, such as CNT/polyaniline//CNT/MnO 2 /GR (24.8 Wh/kg) 53 , carbon aerogel//Co 3 O 4 (17.9 Wh/kg) 38 , graphene(IL-CMG)//RuO 2 –IL-CMG (19.7 Wh/kg) 41 , TiN@GNSs//Fe 2 N@GNSs (15.4 Wh/kg) 54 , NiCo 2 O 4 @PPy//activated carbon (AC) (58.8 Wh/kg) 40 , NiCo 2 O 4 /CC//porous graphene papers (PGP) (60.9 Wh/kg) 55 , γ-MnS//eggplant derived AC (EDAC) (37.6 Wh/kg) 56 , CoS//AC (5.3 Wh/kg) 57 , CoMoO 4 @NiMoO 4 •xH 2 O//Fe 2 O 3 (41.8 Wh/kg) 58 , CuS/3D graphene//3D graphene (5 Wh/kg) 59 , MnO 2 @PANI//3D graphene foam (GF) (37 Wh/kg) 60 , NiCo 2 S 4 /polyaniline//AC (54.06 Wh/kg) 61 , NiCo-LDH//carbon nanorods (59.2 Wh/kg) 39 , Ni(OH) 2 /RGO/Ni//RGO aerogel/Ni (24.5 Wh/kg) 62 , and rGO/CoAl-LDH//rGO (22.6 Wh/kg) 63 .…”