1994
DOI: 10.1006/viro.1994.1215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assembly of HIV GAG-B-Galactosidase Fusion Proteins into Virus Particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
57
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps the HIV Pol possesses some uncharacterized property distinct from that of the ␤-Gal. In support of this hypothesis, it has been demonstrated clearly that the HIV GBG (32), not HIV Pr160 gag-pol , is severely impaired in its incorporation into virions upon removal of the N-terminal myristylation signal. Thus, it is conceivable that HIV Pol may have as-yet-undefined functions associated with it which are involved in the process of Gag-Pol transport and incorporation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Perhaps the HIV Pol possesses some uncharacterized property distinct from that of the ␤-Gal. In support of this hypothesis, it has been demonstrated clearly that the HIV GBG (32), not HIV Pr160 gag-pol , is severely impaired in its incorporation into virions upon removal of the N-terminal myristylation signal. Thus, it is conceivable that HIV Pol may have as-yet-undefined functions associated with it which are involved in the process of Gag-Pol transport and incorporation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…It is possible that the Nterminal 15 residues may be responsible for rescue of the mutant [⌬GAG or ⌬(GAGϩPR)] into particles via putative interactions with the Pr55 gag . This is unlikely, however, because HIV Gag-␤-galactosidase (HIV GBG) fusion proteins, constructed by fusion of the ␤-Gal gene to HIV gag at the Nterminal 15th codon or at the C terminus of MA, were excluded from HIV particles (32), suggesting that the N-terminal 15 residues are not involved in the incorporation of Gag-Pol into virus particles. In contrast, HIV GBG (analogous to the HIV Gag-Pol) fused at the end of the NC domain was efficiently incorporated into virus particles (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural studies and protein-protein interaction analyses have demonstrated that CA and SP1 likely contribute to Gag multimerization by facilitating direct interactions between Gag molecules (24, 29, 31, 33, 59-61, 67, 96). Mutations and deletions in the C-terminal domain of CA (12,21,42,50,56,58,76,82,87,88,90) and SP1 (1,45,49,93) cause defects in virus particle production, indicating that the Gag-Gag interaction mediated by this region is physiologically important for virus assembly. Unlike CA and SP1, NC is thought to promote Gag multimerization primarily through interaction with RNA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vivo studies with both RSV and HIV have shown that the bulk of MA and the N terminus of CA are dispensable for capsid assembly and budding as long as a membrane-targeting domain is located at the N terminus and the NC domain is intact (13,35,37). In general, the NC domain or an equivalent region C terminal of CA that can mediate the association of Gag molecules appears to be critical for the assembly of capsids with a density resembling that of wild-type virus (2,23,36,38,39,40). Similar conclusions were drawn from in vitro binding experiments with HIV type 1 Gag deletion mutants (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%