2016
DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2016.1143351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing agricultural vulnerability to climate change in the Nordic countries – an interactive geovisualization approach

Abstract: Nordic agriculture must adapt to climate change to reduce vulnerability and exploit potential opportunities. Integrated assessments can identify and quantify vulnerability in order to recognize these adaptation needs. This study presents a geographic visualization approach to support the interactive assessment of agricultural vulnerability to climate change. We have identified requirements for increased transparency and reflexivity in vulnerability assessments, arguing that these can be met by geographic visua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…how the weighting alters final maps than trying to find out the best method for weighting. In the puzzle of setting weights, different visualization tools used in wider stakeholder processes (Bohman et al 2015;Carter et al 2016;Rød et al 2015;Wirehn et al 2017) may also help, especially if one considers that vulnerability mapping is a learning process, rather than considering the final maps as the most important product. It is also possible to include processes of validation and negotiation into the stakeholder process when weighting indicators (Carter et al 2016;Rød et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…how the weighting alters final maps than trying to find out the best method for weighting. In the puzzle of setting weights, different visualization tools used in wider stakeholder processes (Bohman et al 2015;Carter et al 2016;Rød et al 2015;Wirehn et al 2017) may also help, especially if one considers that vulnerability mapping is a learning process, rather than considering the final maps as the most important product. It is also possible to include processes of validation and negotiation into the stakeholder process when weighting indicators (Carter et al 2016;Rød et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the two proof-of-concept implementations of polyline glyphs have already been described elsewhere, 4,7 we only briefly demonstrate how the dynamic linking of parallel coordinates to polyline glyphs may work.…”
Section: Dynamic Linking Of Parallel Coordinates To Polyline Glyphs: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The agroEXPLORE tool was designed to enable an agricultural vulnerability index (AVI) to be constructed for Swedish municipalities. 7 Users can select indicators, adjust their weights, and move between sub-indices on exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity. Additionally, weights can be set for the sub-indices.…”
Section: Dynamic Linking Of Parallel Coordinates To Polyline Glyphs: mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several quantitative assessments of vulnerability to climate change have been made through different analyses and comparisons of agricultural vulnerability in different regions of the world, generating composite indices based on sets of indicators [11]. Such indicators generally cover multiple dimensions of the concept of vulnerability, capturing the exposure, sensitivity, and adaptability of a system [12] [13]. In the case of Colombia, according to the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, agricultural production at the national level has been affected by the occurrence of extreme weather events associated with climate change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%