Assessing alternative production options for eco-efficient food supply chains using multi-objective optimization

Abstract

Due to tremendous losses of resources in modern food supply chains, higher priority should be given to reducing food waste and environmental impacts of food production. In practice, multiple production options are available, but must be quantitatively assessed with respect to economic and environmental performances before they are adopted in food supply chains. The objective of this paper is to develop a mathematical model that can be used for such a quantitative assessment of alternative production options that are associated with different ways to deal with waste in food supply chains, i.e. prevention, recycling, and disposal of food waste. We develop a multi-objective mixed integer linear programming model to derive the set of eco-efficient solutions corresponding to production planning decisions. Environmental performance of the chain is expressed with an indicator based on exergy analysis, which has the potential to capture other commonly used indicators, such as energy consumption, fuel consumption, and waste generation, and express them in a single value. This simplifies the calculation of the eco-efficient frontier, and enables its intuitive graphical representation, which is much easier to communicate to the involved decision makers. The applicability of the developed model is demonstrated on a real-life industrial bread supply chain in the Netherlands. Results confirm the findings from literature that prevention is the best waste management strategy from environmental perspective. The advantages of using exergy as an indicator to capture the environmental performance is demonstrated by comparing the outcomes to other commonly used indicators of environmental performance. We illustrate the potential of studying food production planning decision problems in a multi-objective context, and demonstrate the applicability of the model in the assessment of alternative production options.

Optimising the assignment of swabs and reagent for PCR testing during a viral epidemic

“…In the standard case, in fact, the aim of the planner is pure cost minimisation [30] and satisfying the demand in full could even be sub-optimal, if the cost of producing one more unit is larger than the opportunity cost of missing a sale. Other approaches commonly used in production planning include multi-objective optimisation in which cost minimisation is tackled together with secondary objectives, such as demand satisfaction [26] , steadiness of production rates [40] or environmental performance [2] . Even in the healthcare sector, if considering times when authorities are not responding to an emergency, costs are taken into account.…”

A ranking method for prioritising retail store food waste based on monetary and environmental impacts

“…First, in retail stores, the flexibility to redistribute food for alternative use is limited because little of the products' shelf life is left, and food waste is a net loss on a store's ledger (Kiil et al, 2018). Second, the accumulated environmental (Banasik et al, 2017) and monetary (Alexander and Smaje, 2008;Eriksson et al, 2016) impacts of waste from previous stages are larger in stores compared with earlier supply chain stages. Third, stores act as buffer stocks, where supply meets consumer demand (Eriksson et al, 2012), and managerial interventions are critical to balance product availability (avoiding lost sales and the risk of losing customers) with overstocking (avoiding the risk of causing waste due to products' shelf lives expiring) (Shukla and Jharkharia, 2013;Lee, 2018).…”

Biotechnology-Inspired Solutions to Further Increase Sustainability and Healthiness in the Bakery Market

“…Joke A. Putseys 1 DSM Food Specialties/DSM Biotechnology Center, Delft, The Netherlands scribed as the major determinant of the staling process (8). One of the most effective ways to stop this process (and thus prevent staling as a source of food waste) is through the addition of a maltogenic a-amylase enzyme (9).…”