2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11564-1_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Bipolar Episodes Using Speech Cues Derived from Phone Calls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
78
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same features were used across studies, yielding 176 investigated features, with information about directionality with respect to the mood score on 155/176 (88%) of the cases. The other cases (n=21) report on accuracy and weightings by combining objective features into single evaluations, which was mostly observed in research papers with classification models [53,61,66,67]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The same features were used across studies, yielding 176 investigated features, with information about directionality with respect to the mood score on 155/176 (88%) of the cases. The other cases (n=21) report on accuracy and weightings by combining objective features into single evaluations, which was mostly observed in research papers with classification models [53,61,66,67]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes features within sleep and voice. In particular, sleep duration was the most investigated feature (n=6), with statistically significant correlations in 4 studies Furthermore, subject was one of the less included categories, which could be due to the second-level processing required to achieve features of voice [66] or sleep durations through multiple sensors [51]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, they did have accuracy measures and weightings that assist in the understanding of the individual objective features. In a study where Muaremi et al [60] used microphone features to classify mood, they achieved an F1 accuracy of 82%, and discovered speaking time as the best-performing feature. By expanding to include GPS and accelerometer-related features, Abdullah et al [54] achieved an F1 accuracy of 85.5% with the GPS feature: Distance achieving largest weighting.…”
Section: Feature Combined Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, sleep duration was the most investigated secondary feature (n = 4) with statistically significant correlations in all four studies including non-clinical samples of participants. Furthermore, subject is one of the less included primary features, which could be due to the second-level processing required to achieve secondary features of voice [60] or sleep durations from multiple sensors [52]. We also saw more creative secondary features such as the amount of time with no sound detection (speech pauses; = 0.34, p <.01) that β are only investigated in single studies but show promising results [55].…”
Section: Primary Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%