2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing dependency of part properties on the printing location in laser-powder bed fusion metal additive manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors have reported higher differences and attributed them to density/porosity differences between the production areas. These porosity fluctuations were linked to heterogeneities in the spatter distribution [24,25]. However, in this study, no variation in the density was reported, except for area 2, which had a lower relative density but did not present a drop in elongation, as noted by [24].…”
Section: Effect Of Sample Positioning On Fabrication Plateformcontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some authors have reported higher differences and attributed them to density/porosity differences between the production areas. These porosity fluctuations were linked to heterogeneities in the spatter distribution [24,25]. However, in this study, no variation in the density was reported, except for area 2, which had a lower relative density but did not present a drop in elongation, as noted by [24].…”
Section: Effect Of Sample Positioning On Fabrication Plateformcontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…These porosity fluctuations were linked to heterogeneities in the spatter distribution [24,25]. However, in this study, no variation in the density was reported, except for area 2, which had a lower relative density but did not present a drop in elongation, as noted by [24]. Moreover, the fracture energies as a function of the building and notch orientations did not evolve as a function of the production area.…”
Section: Effect Of Sample Positioning On Fabrication Plateformcontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Each batch contained vertically and horizontally aligned samples, as illustrated in Figure 1, to allow in-plane and through-plane measurement via flash diffusivity, respectively. It is worth noting, other build parameters such as shielding gas flow rate (Reijonen et al , 2020), recoating speed (Phua et al , 2021), particle size distribution of the powder (Bonesso et al , 2021), power degradation (Raza et al , 2021) and geometry of the parts (Jones et al , 2021) and their location on the build plate (Mussatto et al , 2022) can affect the porosity and hence the thermal performance of the fabricated part which should be investigated in the future work. Furthermore, process variation based on build design can affect residual stress (Pant et al , 2020) and the thermal history, which could affect microstructure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direct replicability of 3D printing assumed in prior forecasts require both repeatability and reproducibility (Khorasani et al, 2021; Mussatto et al, 2022; Salmi et al, 2013). Repeatability means creating identical objects using the same operator, environment, and equipment (e.g., 3D printer, software, materials) in a short interval of time.…”
Section: Reverse Salients In 3d Printingmentioning
confidence: 99%