2018
DOI: 10.1177/1534508418799173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing Early Literacy Growth in Preschoolers Using Individual Growth and Development Indicators

Abstract: Evidence of longitudinal relations between language and early literacy skills in early childhood and later reading (and other) achievement is growing, along with an expanding array of early education programs designed to improve later academic outcomes and prevent, reduce, or close later academic achievement gaps across groups. Assessment systems to support this intervention have been developed, but to date we have little evidence of these systems’ outcomes when used at a broad scale in community-based prescho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most research that has examined language gains (1) considered these gains as the outcome of interest, such as intervention studies or correlational studies of associations between classroom quality or language practices and language learning (e.g., Burchinal et al, 2021;Hadley et al, 2022;Herrera et al, 2021;Rogde et al, 2019); (2) examined longitudinal associations between gains in one aspect of language and other language outcomes (e.g., Donnelly & Kidd, 2021;Rowe et al, 2012); or (3) described children's language gains over time (e.g., Kincaid et al, 2020;Schmitt et al, 2017). To our knowledge, studies examining language change as a predictor of other longitudinal outcomes are very limited; we are aware of a few studies examining this within the area of socioemotional development (e.g., Petersen & LeBeau, 2021) and two studies that used latent change scores (LCSs) to examine bidirectional associations between change in vocabulary and change in reading comprehension in samples of elementary school students (Quinn et al, 2015(Quinn et al, , 2020.…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most research that has examined language gains (1) considered these gains as the outcome of interest, such as intervention studies or correlational studies of associations between classroom quality or language practices and language learning (e.g., Burchinal et al, 2021;Hadley et al, 2022;Herrera et al, 2021;Rogde et al, 2019); (2) examined longitudinal associations between gains in one aspect of language and other language outcomes (e.g., Donnelly & Kidd, 2021;Rowe et al, 2012); or (3) described children's language gains over time (e.g., Kincaid et al, 2020;Schmitt et al, 2017). To our knowledge, studies examining language change as a predictor of other longitudinal outcomes are very limited; we are aware of a few studies examining this within the area of socioemotional development (e.g., Petersen & LeBeau, 2021) and two studies that used latent change scores (LCSs) to examine bidirectional associations between change in vocabulary and change in reading comprehension in samples of elementary school students (Quinn et al, 2015(Quinn et al, , 2020.…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The early detection and intervention may decrease the number of young children with difficulties in the future. Moreover, assessment systems that support these efforts are increasingly important because can be indicators of the developmental difficulties that may affect emotional and social outcomes for an individual across their life span (Fricke et al, 2017;Haley et al, 2017;Kincaid, McConnell & Wackerle-Hollman, 2020;Rogde, Melby-Lervåg, & Lervåg, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With increased demands on educators' time, implementing strategies that are easy to use, fast to implement, and result in desired student outcomes is imperative. Recently, researchers have focused on incorporating technology into DBDM (e.g., cloud-based systems: Buzhardt et al, 2010; Johnson, 2017 and app-based: Kincaid et al, 2018).…”
Section: Utilization Of Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%