2015
DOI: 10.1075/hsld.4.09gab
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing foreign language speech rhythm in multilingual learners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…French and German differ crucially with respect to their overall prosodic shape: With regard to global speech rhythm, French belongs to the group of syllable-timed languages, which are characterized by a strong preference for regular sequences of CV syllables and the absence of vowel reduction. German, by contrast, is a stress-timed language, which presents more complex syllable structures and regular reduction of unstressed vowels ( [1]). As for intonation, French has a phrase-based system with the Accentual Phrase (AP) as its basic unit, which is mapped to the underlying tonal pattern /aLHiLH*/ ( [2], [3], [4]), while German is a pitch accent language with the F0 contour being determined by the positions of metrically strong syllables in prosodic words ( [5], [6], [7], [8]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…French and German differ crucially with respect to their overall prosodic shape: With regard to global speech rhythm, French belongs to the group of syllable-timed languages, which are characterized by a strong preference for regular sequences of CV syllables and the absence of vowel reduction. German, by contrast, is a stress-timed language, which presents more complex syllable structures and regular reduction of unstressed vowels ( [1]). As for intonation, French has a phrase-based system with the Accentual Phrase (AP) as its basic unit, which is mapped to the underlying tonal pattern /aLHiLH*/ ( [2], [3], [4]), while German is a pitch accent language with the F0 contour being determined by the positions of metrically strong syllables in prosodic words ( [5], [6], [7], [8]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%